Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5722 Gua
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2024
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010035322024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/881/2024
JUJU KULI PAMEY @ JUJU PAME AND 3 ORS
W/O LATE BIKASH PAMEY @ PAME
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKUT KOKE, PS JONAI, DIST DHEMAJI, ASSAM
787060
2: ASIN PAME
S/O LATE BIKASH PAMEY @ PAME
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKUT KOKE
PS JONAI
DIST DHEMAJI
ASSAM 787060
TO BE REP. BY PET. NO. 1
3: KUNJALATA PAME
W/O BIMALA PAME
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKUT KOKE
PS JONAI
DIST DHEMAJI
ASSAM 787060
4: BIMALA PAMEY @ PAME
S/O LATE UKEL PAME
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKUT KOKE
PS JONAI
DIST DHEMAJI
ASSAM 78706
VERSUS
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS COMPANY LTD AND 2 ORS
AASTHA PLAZA, GS ROAD, BORA SERVICEL OPP. SB DEORAH
COLLEGE,PO GUWAHATI 07, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM
Page No.# 2/4
2:ABI TAGA
S/O TANIYOK TAGA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND PO MIRBUK
791102
PS PASIGHAT
DIST EAST SIYANG
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
3:KABIT TAGA
S/O TAPANG TAGA
VILLAGE JOMO PO RUMGONG
791001
DIST WEST SIYANG
ARUNACHAL PRADES
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R AGARWALA, MR ADITYA AGARWALA,MS. R
LAILA,MD. K ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA (r-1), MR A CHANDRAN(R-2,3)
Linked Case :
JUJU KULI PAMEY @ JUJU PAME AND 3 ORS
VERSUS
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS COMPANY LTD AND 2 ORS (F)
------------
Advocate for : MR. A R AGARWALA
Advocate for : appearing for CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS COMPANY LTD
AND 2 ORS (F)
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 09-08-2024
Heard Mr. A. R. Agarwala, learned counsel for the applicant. I have also heard Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Mr. A. Chandran, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.
This is an application filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 13 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 03.11.2023, passed by the learned Member, MACT No. 2, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in MAC case no. 2025/2021.
The ground for delay in not preferring the connected appeal on time has been explained in para 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the condonation petition, and I am satisfied that the applicant has been able to show sufficient cause for not preferring the connected appeal within the stipulated time. Moreover, the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the delay of 13 days in preferring the connected appeal is condoned.
In view of the above, the delay of 13 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
With the above, this IA stands disposed of.
The Office shall register the connected appeal, and list it for admission, by Page No.# 4/4
reflecting the name of Mr. A. Bhattacharyya as the learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Mr. A. Chandran, as the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!