Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1282 Gua
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010049342023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1359/2023
KABITA DUTTA
W/O- MINESWAR HAZARIKA, R/O- WARD NO 8, BIHPURIA TOWN, P.O.
BIHPURIA, P.S. BIHPURIA, PIN- 784161, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, SECONDARY
EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, PIN- 781006, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY-6
3:THE DIRECTOR
SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPTT.
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
PIN- 781019
DIST.- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
4:THE DIRECTOR
PENSIONS
ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX
NEW BUILDING
DISPUR
GHY-6
5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
Page No.# 2/3
LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT CIRCLE
NORTH LAKHIMPUR
DIST.- LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
6:THE TREASURY OFFICER
BIHPURIA
NORTH LAKHIMPUR
DIST.- NORTH LAKHIMPU
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
29.03.2023
Heard Mr. D. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. D. Mochahary, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1, 3 & 5. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 & 6 as well as Mr. S. R. Boruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.4.
The grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition was that an amount of Rs.1,44,133/- was recovered from the petitioner under duress. Accordingly, on the basis of the judgment in the case of State of Punjab and Others vs. Rafiq Mashi (White Washer) , reported in (2015) 4
SCC 334, the petitioner had sought for refund of the said amount.
This Court vide the order dated 15.03.2023, directed the respondents to apprise this Court on the next returnable date as to why the petitioner is not entitled to the refund of the amount of Rs.1,44,133/-.
Page No.# 3/3
Today, Ms. D. Mochahary, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Secondary Education Department has produced a communication dated 29.303.2023 and submitted that the authorities have already condoned the overdrawn amount of Rs.1,44,133/- by the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to the said amount of Rs.1,44,133/- which she had deposited. The said communication is kept on the record and marked with the letter "X".
Under such circumstances, the respondents, more particularly, the Director of Secondary Education Department is directed to refund the amount of Rs.1,44,133/- to the petitioner within a period of 3 (three) months from the date a certified copy of the instant order is served upon the said respondent No.3.
With the above observation and direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!