Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2545 Gua
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010038292023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1211/2023
MAMIDUL HASSAN
S/O- ABDUL BAREK
R/O- VILL.- DABALIA PARA
P.S. HOWLY
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781316.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM
COOPERATION DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
COOPERATION DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE REGISTRAR
COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
ASSAM
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI.
4:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE ON COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
5:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE ON COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/3
BARPETA.
6:THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR
COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
BARPETA.
------------
Advocate for : MR H R A CHOUDHURY
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
16.06.2023 Heard Ms. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Borah,
learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing for the respondent Nos.4 and 5 and
Ms. M. D. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Cooperation Department, Assam
appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 6.
The petitioner herein had submitted an application seeking appointment on
compassionate ground against a Grade-III post after the demise of his father.
The application submitted by the petitioner on 18.06.2016 was duly
recommended by the District Level Committee (DLC) in its meeting held on
14.07.2017. However, the recommendation of the DLC was rejected by the
State Level Committee (SLC) on the ground that the father of the petitioner did
not have three years of service left to his credit at the time of his demise. The
aforesaid decision was apparently taken by relying upon Clause-1 of the
Government O.M. dated 01.06.2015.
By referring to the decision of the SLC, Ms. Das submits that Clause1 of the O.M.
dated 01.06.2015 has been set aside by the learned Single Judge of this Court
by judgment and order dated 30.01.2023 passed in connection with WP(C) Page No.# 3/3
No.1646/2021. Although the State has preferred an appeal against the
aforesaid judgment and order dated 30.01.2023, no interim stay has been
granted by the Division Bench. As such, the minutes of the SLC meeting be set
aside and the matter be remanded back for reconsideration.
Mr. Borah, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam submits that similar orders have
been passed in similar writ petitions and therefore, he would have no objection
if an order remanding the matter back to the SLC is passed in the present case
as well.
Same is the stand of the learned Standing Counsel, Cooperation Department.
In view of the above, the resolution of the SLC dated 22.01.2022 qua the writ
petitioner is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the SLC for
taking fresh decision dehors Clause-1 of the O.M. dated 01.06.2015. The
aforesaid decision be taken as expeditiously as possible but not later than six
months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!