Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs Baleswar Prasad Gupta And 3 Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 442 Gua

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 442 Gua
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2023

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/4 vs Baleswar Prasad Gupta And 3 Ors on 8 February, 2023
                                                                  Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010017312023




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : CRP(IO)/38/2023

         PARUL HAZARIKA AND 2 ORS
         W/O LATE RANA JAGADISH HAZARIKA, R/O MOINAPARA (NEAR DHASIRI
         BRIDGE), P.O.-MORANGI, P.S.-GOLAGHAT, DIST-GOLAGHAT, ASSAM

         2: MISS PRIYANKA HAZARIKA
          D/O LATE RANA JAGADISH HAZARIKA
          R/O MOINAPARA (NEAR DHASIRI BRIDGE)
          P.O.-MORANGI
          P.S.-GOLAGHAT
          DIST-GOLAGHAT
         ASSAM

         3: PARTHA PROTIM HAZARIKA
          S/O LATE RANA JAGADISH HAZARIKA
          R/O MOINAPARA (NEAR DHASIRI BRIDGE)
          P.O.-MORANGI
          P.S.-GOLAGHAT
          DIST-GOLAGHAT
         ASSA

         VERSUS

         BALESWAR PRASAD GUPTA AND 3 ORS
         S/O S. PRASAD GUPTA, R/O CHANMARI COLONY, P.O.-KOHIMA, DIST-
         KOHIMA (NAGALAND), AT PRESENT R/O NEAR SATYA NARAYAN
         SERVICE, GOTA NAGAR, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM

         2:SHAKTI PRASAD SAHANI
          S/O G. SAHANI
          R/O 150 COLLIN STREET
          KOLKATA
         WEST BENGAL
          PIN-700016
                                                                                Page No.# 2/4

            3:RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LIMITED
            ABC
             G.S. ROAD
             GUWAHATI
             DIST-KAMRUP (M)
            ASSAM
             PIN-781005 REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER

            4:ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
             GOLAGHAT BRANCH
             G.F. ROAD
             P.O.-GOLAGHAT
             DIST- GOLAGHAT
            ASSAM
             PIN-785621
             REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGE

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. M DUTTA

Advocate for the Respondent :




                                   BEFORE
                     HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

                                         ORDER

Date : 08.02.2023

Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner.

By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the legality and validity of the order, dated 13.12.2022, passed in Petition No. 2883/2022, arising out of MAC Case No. 79/2014 by the learned Member, MACT, Golaghat.

The brief fact of the case is that the claimants/petitioners filed a claim petition before the MACT, Golaghat, which was allowed on contest, vide judgment and award dated 15.02.2018, by directing the respondent Insurance Company to pay Rs. 29,91,772/- to the petitioners. Thereafter, being aggrieved with the said judgement, Page No.# 3/4

the respondent Insurance Company preferred an MAC Appeal before this Court, which was dismissed vide judgment and order, dated 03.03.2022. After dismissal of the MAC appeal, the respondent Insurance Company deposited an amount of Rs.25,70,957/- towards the balance amount in full and final settlement of the claim case. Subsequently, the claimants/petitioners filed Petition No. 2883/2022 before the Member, MACT, Golaghat, praying for allowing them to withdraw the deposited amount and the same was allowed. The learned Member, MACT, however, observed that the shares of the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 be kept in a Nationalized Bank for a period of five years. Being aggrieved with the said order, the claimants/petitioners filed this instant petition.

The relevant portion of the order, dated 13.12.2022, is extracted as hereinbelow:-

"Heard the petitioners. Taking note of all the facts and circumstances, the prayer is allowed. The balance awarded amount along with the interest amounting to Rs. 25,70,957/- (Rupees Twenty Five Lakh Seventy Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Seven) only be paid to the claimant Nos. 1, 2 & 3 in equal shares.

It is further ordered that the shares of the awarded amount of the claimants No. 2 and 3 namely Priyanka Hazarika and Partha Protim Hazarika are to be kept in fixed deposit scheme, in a Nationalized Bank near their permanent residence for a period of 5 (five) years."

The record reveals that both the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are aged about 29 and 27 years respectively and, as such, their consent was necessary for depositing their share of award in fixed deposits. There is no evidence to show that their consent was obtained to keep their respective share of award in fixed deposit schemes for a period of 5 (five) years in a Nationalized Bank, which the learned Tribunal omitted to consider seemingly through inadvertence.

Page No.# 4/4

Therefore, the prayer of the petitioners to withdraw their respective shares of compensation award is hereby allowed.

With the above, this petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter