Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No. 1/3 vs North East Frontier Railway And 2 ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 3461 Gua

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3461 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2023

Gauhati High Court
Page No. 1/3 vs North East Frontier Railway And 2 ... on 30 August, 2023
                                                                  Page No. 1/3

GAHC010193122023




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/5042/2023

         M/S INFOTECH SOLUTION AND ANR
         A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SWAGOTA
         ENVISSION, 3RD FLOOR, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, BACKSIDE SIX
         MILE, G.S ROAD, KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI-02,
         REP. BY ONE OF ITS PARTNERS PURANJOY NEOG

         2: PURANJOY NEOG
          S/O- RAMESWAR NEOG
          R/O- H.NO- 62
          NAYANTARA BYE- LANE
          JANAKPUR PATH
          KAHILIPARA
          GUWAHATI-19
          DIST- KAMRUP (M)
         ASSAM

         VERSUS

         NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND 2 ORS
         REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER , MALIGAON, GUWAHATI-11

         2:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL SIGNAL AND TELECOM ENGINEER/GS
          N.F RAILWAY
          RANGIA
         ASSAM
          PIN-781354

         3:M/S WOOD ENTERPRISE- TINSUKIA
          REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR
          GAURAV AGARWAL
          HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT A.T ROAD
          MAKUM JUNCTION
         TINSUKIA
         ASSAM
          PIN-78617
                                                                                     Page No. 2/3


Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P BHOWMICK

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.

                                    BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                           ORDER

Date : 30.08.2023

Heard Mr. P. Bhowmick, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Chrakraborty, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for the respondent nos. 1 & 2.

2. On 10.04.2023, the respondent N.F. Railway authorities vide E-Tender Notice no. RN- ST-43-2022-23 dated 10.04.2023 invited E-Tenders for a contract-work : "Provisions of Display system in connection with station upgradation work at 11 nos. of stations under Amrit Bharat Station Scheme of Rangiya Division" with a tender value of ₹ 2,01,24,418.38. The date of closing of E-Tender was 08.05.2023. One of the conditions of eligibility, contained in Clause 10.1[a][iii], as per the bidding documents is that the bidder must have successfully completed or substantially completed one similar work costing not less than the amount equal to 60% of the advertised value of the tender.

3. Mr. Bhowmick, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had executed a contract-work : "S&T work for Joint Development of Railway station in association with Ministry of Tourism [MOT] at Guwahati Station" with a contract value of ₹ 2,30,40,166.00. As per the work completion certificate, the payment received by the petitioner in the years : 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 were ₹ 22,04,424.00 and ₹ 95,65,331.00. Mr. Bhowmick has further referred to a judgment and decree dated 26.06.2023 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge no. 1, Kamrup [Metro] in Money Suit no. 42/2022. The said money suit was instituted by the petitioner for realisation of a sum of ₹ 1,14,93.371.00. The suit was decreed in favour for of the petitioner firm as the plaintiff with a decree for realisation of ₹ 1,12,70,411.00 on the admission of the respondent N.F. Railway authorities wherein they had admitted the liability to the extent of ₹ 1,12,70,411.00. Mr. Bhowmick has, Page No. 3/3

thus, contended that if the figures in the completion certificate and the judgment and decree are added together, the petitioner qualifies under the condition set forth in Clause 10.A[iii] of the bidding document.

4. Mr. Chakraborty, learned CGC has sought for listing of the case on 08.09.2023 in order to enable the instructions preferably in written form.

5. Having regard to the projections made on behalf of the petitioner and for the purpose of balancing the equities, it is provided till 08.09.2023, the status quo, as on date, shall be maintained in respect of the Contract-Work in question. The order of status quo, passed today, will be reconsidered for extension or otherwise, on the next date of listing, on the basis of the instructions to be placed on behalf of the respondent N.F. Railway authorities.

6. List the case on 08.09.2023.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter