Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 934 Gua
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2022
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010050002022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1867/2022
GAURAV UPADHYAY
S/O. LT. SHYAM SUNDAR UPADHYAY, R/O. SILPUKHURI, GUWAHATI,
ASSAM, PIN-781003.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR-781006,
ASSAM.
2:THE SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
WPT AND BC DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI-01.
4:THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPTT.
ASSAM POLICE
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-781005.
5:THE PRESIDENT
ALL ASSAM TRIBAL SANGHA
TRIBAL REST HOUSE
SOLAPAR
Page No.# 2/4
PALTANBAZAR
GUWAHATI-781008.
6:DIVYANA A. LAHAN (MINOR)
REP. BY HER MOTHER SMT. LEENA DOLEY
R/O. E/VI
ZONE II
POLICE QUARTERS
DR. B.K. KAKATI ROAD
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-781007.
7:MASTER AAYANG L. LAHAN (MINOR)
REP. BY HIS MOTHER SMT. LEENA DOLEY
R/O. E/VI
ZONE II
POLICE QUARTERS
DR. B.K. KAKATI ROAD
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-781007.
8:SMT. LEENA DOLEY
W/O. LT. NILOTPAL LAHAN
R/O. E/VI
ZONE II
POLICE QUARTERS
DR. B.K. KAKATI ROAD
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-781007.
9:THE STATE LEVEL CASTE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
ASSAM REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM
WPT AND BC DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J KHATANIAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
16.03.2022
Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, who submits that there was an allegation of outraging the modesty of the daughter of the respondent no.8 and that the daughter belonged to the ST Category. He submits that the State Level Scrutiny Committee has however found that the daughter of the respondent no.8 did not belong to the ST Category. The petitioner's counsel submits that the State Government has not taken any action against the respondent no.8, for making a false claim, with regard to the status of her daughter in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court in Kumari Madhuri Patil & Another VS Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development & Others, reported in (1994) 6 SCC 24 [Paragraph 13(14)].
Issue Notice to the respondent nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 8 & 9 at this stage returnable in 6 (six) weeks.
Ms. M.D. Borah, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1, 3 & 4 while Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of all respondent nos.2 & 9.
The petitioner to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent no.8 by Registered post with AD within 3 (three) days.
Ms. M.D. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1, 3 & 4 submits that on reading the prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition, the petitioner should have approached the State Government with regard to her grievance. The maintainability of the writ petition is kept Page No.# 4/4
open.
List the matter after six weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!