Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 731 Gua
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2022
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010064772020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/24/2022
SMTI NANDITA BARUA AND 4 ORS
W/O- SRI ANANDA BAHUGUNA,R/O- MALAYA NAGAR, NEW DELHI
2: NIBEDITA RAJURA
R/O MALAYA NAGAR
NEW DELHI
3: SUBHANA BORTHAKUR
W/O LT. MAHENDRA BORTHAKUR
R/O AMOLAPATTY
MOUZA-TOWN
P.S. SADAR NAGAON
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782003
PH NO. 8724981572
4: ARCHANA GOSWAMI
W/O SRI MAHENDRA GOSWAMI
R/O CHAKIDINGI
DIST. DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
5: ANJANA BORTHAKUR
W/O ARUP BORTHAKUR
R/O JATIA
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP
ASSA
VERSUS
Page No.# 2/4
SMTI BANDANA BHATTACHARJEE AND 5 ORS
D/O LT. BINUD BHATTACHARJEE, R/O PRATAP SHARMA ROAD,
AMOLAPATTY, MOUZA-TOWN, P.S. SADAR, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM
2:RANJIT BHATTACHARJEE
S/O LT. BINUD BHATTACHARJEE
R/O PRATAP SHARMA ROAD
AMOLAPATTY
MOUZA-TOWN
P.S. SADAR
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
3:PRASENJIT BHATTACHARJEE
S/O LT. BINUD BHATTACHARJEE
R/O PRATAP SHARMA ROAD
AMOLAPATTY
MOUZA-TOWN
P.S. SADAR
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
4:MUKUL CH. BORAH
S/O LT. J.C. BORH R/O A.R.B. ROAD
KHUTIKATIA
MOUZA-KACHAMARI
PS SADAR
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
5:SANTOSH BORKAKATI
S/O LT. SUKLESWAR BORKAKATI
R/O AMOLAPATTY MOUZA-TOWN
P.S. SADAR
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
6:SIRUMONI BORKAKATI
W/O SRI SANTOSH BORKAKATI
R/O AMOLAPATTY MOUZA-TOWN
P.S. SADAR
DIST. NAGAON
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P S DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. P BHATTACHARYA
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 02.03.2022
Heard Mr. B.K. Bhagawati, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Ms.P. Bhattacharya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
The appeal is admitted for hearing upon the following substantial questions of law.
(i) Whether the impugned judgments and decree of the Ld. Court's below is sustainable for the failure to declare the right, title, interest of the appellants/plaintiffs though the appellants/plaintiffs right, title, interest over the suit land and same is admitted by the contesting parties?
(ii) Whether the finding given by the Ld. 1 st Appellate Court is sustainable on the point of waiver, acquiescence and estoppel? Issue notice returnable within 8(eight) weeks. No formal notice required to be served upon the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 as because Ms. Bhattacharya has entered appearance on their behalf.
The appellant shall take steps for service of notice upon the remaining respondents by registered posts with AD as well as by other usual process. Call for the LCR.
The applicant shall be at liberty to raise any other substantial question Page No.# 4/4
of law at the time of hearing.
List the matter after 8(eight) weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!