Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1987 Gua
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2022
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010005682022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/773/2022
MD. KALIM AHMED AND 7 ORS.
S/O- ABDUL KADIR, VILL.- KATHALTALI, P.O. BAZARICHERRA, DIST.-
KARIMGANJ, ASSAM-788725.
2: ABU MD. NUMAN TALUKDAR
S/O- MD. RASHID AHMED TALUKDAR
VILL.- DALURBOND
P.O. MUKTARAMPUR
P.S. R.K. NAGAR
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM-788156.
3: AMRUL HOQUE
S/O- ABDUL KADIR
VILL.- SAIZANAGAR
P.O. KANAIBAZAR
P.S. PATHARKANDI
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM-788724.
4: MD. NASIMULLA BABOR
S/O- FAIJUR RAHMAN
VILL.- GUNGABARI
P.O. KALKALIGHAT
P.S. PATHARKANDI
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN-788725.
5: MD. ISMAIL AHMED
S/O- ABDUL MATIN
VILL.- JHERJHERI
P.O. PREMTALA
DIST.NORTH TRIPURA
Page No.# 2/4
TRIPURA
PIN- 799261.
6: MD. ABDUL WAHID LASKAR
S/O- ABDUL HAMID LASKAR
VILL.- CHANDINAGAR PART-I
P.O. SAIDPUR (AMTALA)
P.S. KATIGORAH
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM-788815.
7: AKBAR HUSSAIN CHOUDHURY
S/O- ABDUL KADIR CHOUDHURY
VILL.- CHANDINAGAR PART-I
P.O. SAIDPUR (AMTALA)
P.S. KATIGORAH
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM-788815.
8: ALI HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA
S/O- FERUJ UDDIN
R/O- VILL.- HORINAGAR PART-II
P.O. RAJARTILLA
P.S. KATIGORAH
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788805
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
TO BE REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19.
4:THE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
Page No.# 3/4
ASSAM (TO BE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
5:THE STATE MADRASSA EDUCATION BOARD
ASSAM. (TO BE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R BHUYAN
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
O R D E R
06.06.2022
The law of transforming all the provincialised Madrassa institutes into regular educational institute was assailed in WP(C) No. 3038/2021 and the Division Bench by its judgment dated 04.02.2022 had dismissed the said challenge.
In the aforesaid circumstance, this writ petition is instituted that the students who were pursuing their education in the provincialised Madrassa institutions would now be seriously inconvenienced.
Once a law had been assailed, but upheld through a judicial adjudication, whether any further issue can be determined by another Court as to whether any inconvenience would be caused by the effects of the law which was challenged being upheld would be a preliminary question in this writ petition.
Mr. AR Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue of Page No.# 4/4
inconvenience was not taken into consideration by the Division Bench when the aforesaid law was adjudicated.
If it is so, the further issue would remain as to whether the principles of constructive res-judicata would be applicable in such event.
Mr. AR Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks for an adjournment to examine the matter further.
List the matter after one week.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!