Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3148 Gua
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2021
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010079512021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/125/2021
ON THE DEATH OF KANU DEB HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS
REPRESENTING
1.1: SMTI. SANKARI DEB
W/O LATE KANU DEB
1.2: KUNAL DEB
S/O LATE KANU DEB
1.3: SMTI. MAMPI DEB
D/O LATE KANU DEB
W/O NIHAR RANJAN DEB
R/O COLLEGE ROAD
OPPOSITE WATER SUPPLY
DHARAMNAGAR
TRIPURA
1.4: SMTI PINKI PAUL
D/O LATE KANU DEB
W/O SHRI RAJU PAUL
R/O SHANKAR DIGHIR PAR
SILCHAR
2: BOLAI DEB @ DIPAK DEB
S/O LATE KANU DEB
3: GOPAL DEB
ALL ARE SONS OF LATE KUMUD CHANDRA DEB AND R/O HOSPITAL
ROAD
SILCHAR TOWN
PH. BOKARPAR
P.S.-SILCHAR
P.O.-SILCHAR
DIST-CACHA
Page No.# 2/4
VERSUS
ON THE DEATH OF SUKUMAR CHANDRA PAUL
HIS LEGAL HEIRS
1.1:SMTI. BINA PAUL
W/O LATE SUKUMAR CHANDRA PAUL
R/O RADHA MADHAB NAGAR
SILCHAR TOWN
P.O.-BARAKPAR
DIST-CACHAR
ASSAM
1.2:BIVA PAUL
D/O LATE SUKUMAR CHANDRA PAUL
R/O RADHA MADHAB NAGAR
SILCHAR TOWN
P.O.-BARAKPAR
DIST-CACHAR
ASSAM
1.3:BABY PAUL
W/O DIPAK CHANDRA PAUL
D/O LATE SUKUMAR CHANDRA PAUL
R/O RADHA MADHAB NAGAR
SILCHAR TOWN
P.O.-BARAKPAR
DIST-CACHAR
ASSAM
1.4:BISHNU PAUL
S/O LATE SUKUMAR CHANDRA PAUL
R/O RADHA MADHAB NAGAR
SILCHAR TOWN
P.O.-BARAKPAR
DIST-CACHAR
ASSAM
1.5:BISWAJIT PAUL
S/O LATE SUKUMAR CHANDRA PAUL
R/O RADHA MADHAB NAGAR
SILCHAR TOWN
P.O.-BARAKPAR
DIST-CACHAR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Page No.# 3/4
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 26.11.2021
Heard Mr. S. Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the appellants.
The appeal is admitted for hearing on the following substantial questions of law:
1. Whether the learned Court of appeal was justified in reversing the finding recorded by the Trial Court in issue no.2 to the effect that the suit was not barred by law of limitation so far as the prayer for cancelation of the sale deed dated 06.01.1982 and rectification dated 05.04.1983 is concerned?
2. Whether the learned Court of appeal below committed an error in passing the impugned judgment and decree for declaration of title when the plaintiff being not in possession of the suit land fails to pray for 'recovery of possession' in view of the bar created by the proviso to section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963?
The appellants shall be at liberty to raise any other substantial questions of law at the time of hearing.
Issue notice to the respondents.
The appellant shall take steps for service of notice on the respondents by registered post with A/D and other usual process.
Page No.# 4/4
Call for the LCR.
List after 6 (six) weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!