Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2786 Gua
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2021
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010265632019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP/150/2019
SMTI BIJAYA DEKA AND 3 ORS.
W/O LATE KARUNA KANTA DEKA, R/O VILL-BARBARI (BHAREGAON),
MOUZA-HASTINAPUR, DIST-BARPETA, ASSAM
2: RAHUL DEKA
S/O LATE KARUNA KANTA DEKA
R/O VILL-BARBARI (BHAREGAON)
MOUZA-HASTINAPUR
DIST-BARPETA
ASSAM
3: MS. REKHA DEKA
D/O LATE KARUNA KANTA DEKA
R/O VILL-BARBARI (BHAREGAON)
MOUZA-HASTINAPUR
DIST-BARPETA
ASSAM
4: MS. BHUMI DEKA
D/O LATE KARUNA KANTA DEKA
R/O VILL-BARBARI (BHAREGAON)
MOUZA-HASTINAPUR
DIST-BARPETA
ASSA
VERSUS
KARUNA PATGIRI AND 3 ORS.
S/O SRI LATE DHARANIDHAR PATGIRI, PRESIDENT, LACHIT NAGAR
NAMGHAR SAMITY, PATHSALA, LACHIT NAGAR, PATHSALA TOWN,
WARD NO.1 P.O.-PATHSALA, P.S.-PATACHARKUCHI, DIST-BARPETA
2:DHIRAJ DAS
S/O LATE BASANTA DEKA
Page No.# 2/3
VICE-PRESIDENT
LACHIT NAGAR NAMGHAR SAMITY
PATHSALA
LACHIT NAGAR
PATHSALA TOWN
WARD NO.1 P.O.-PATHSALA
P.S.-PATACHARKUCHI
DIST-BARPETA
3:PRANJIT DAS
S/O LATE NAGEN DAS
SECRETARY
LACHIT NAGAR NAMGHAR SAMITY
PATHSALA
LACHIT NAGAR
PATHSALA TOWN
WARD NO.1 P.O.-PATHSALA
P.S.-PATACHARKUCHI
DIST-BARPETA
4:RAMEN KALITA
S/O JOGESWAR KALITA
LACHIT NAGAR NAMGHAR SAMITY
PATHSALA
LACHIT NAGAR
PATHSALA TOWN
WARD NO.1 P.O.-PATHSALA
P.S.-PATACHARKUCHI
DIST-BARPET
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T J MAHANTA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. T CHAKRABORTY (R1-R4)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 10-11-2021
Heard Mrs. P Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondents.
This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India have Page No.# 3/3
been filed assailing the order dated 06.07.2019 passed in Misc (J) Case No.119/2017 arising out of Title Suit No.9/2008 whereby the application filed by the petitioner to amend the patta number from KP Patta No.49 to NK Patta No.49 was refused. It is no longer res-integra in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Pratibha Singh & Anr. Vs Shanti Devi Prasad & Anr reported in (2003) 2 SCC 330, that such amendment of correction can be very well allowed under the provisions of Order VI Rule 17 or Section 152 of the CPC as the case may be.
In that view of the matter, the impugned order is interfered with and the patta number being KP Patta No.49 as appearing in the paint in Title Suit No.9/2008 and the judgment and decree dated 27.08.2010 in Title Suit No.9/2008 and the judgment and decree dated 27.05.2013 in Title Appeal No.5/2010 shall be read as N.K. Patta No.49.
With the above observation, the instant petition stands disposed of. No costs.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!