Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 222 Gua
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010080202018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2284/2017
UNITED INDIA ISURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 24 WHITES ROAD
CHENNAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI
ASSAM.
VERSUS
TOHIRON BIBI and 6 ORS
W/O SAMSUL HOQUE
R/O VILL. GOKULPUR NAKKATI
P.O. PIAZBARI
P.S. SUKCHAR
DIST. DHUBRI
ASSAM-783128
2:MD.SAMSUL HOQUE
R/O.VILL. GOKULPUR (NAKKATI)
P.O.PIAZBARI
P.S.SUKCHAR
DIST. DHUBRI
ASSAM-783128. RESPONDENT-7
3:SRI GOPAL SAHA
S/O SRI DAM SAHA
R/O BISHNUNAGAR
GOALPARA
2 NO. COLONY
DIST
P.O AND P.S- GOALPARA
ASSAM
783101
4:NURUL ALI
S/O NUR ALI
Page No.# 2/4
R/O VILL- BAGHMARA
P.O- KUCHNIMARA
P.S- MANKACHAR
DIST- DHUBRI
ASSAM
783131
5:NISHER AHMED
S/O ROFIQUE
R/O VILL- BILOSHPUR
MOHOJJOLA NAGAR KAMMRE
P.O AND P.S- KAMRE
UTTAR PRADESH
244921
6:ABDUL RASHID
S/O ABDUL WAHID
R/O VILL DARJEECHOWK
P.O AND P.S- SISGAR
DIS- BORELI
UTTAR PRADESH
243003
7:M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER GUWAHATI
REGIONAL OFFICE
GUWAHATI
G.S. ROAD
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI
ASSAM-781005
------------
Advocate for : MS.L SHARMA
Advocate for : MR. R ALI appearing for TOHIRON BIBI and 6 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 25-01-2021
Heard Ms. L. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. C. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 7.
Office note dated 31.01.2019 indicates that respondent no. 1, 2, 3 & 5 had been duly
served.
Page No.# 3/4
Ms. L. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant prays for striking off the name of
respondent nos. 4 & 6 from the array of the respondents.
According to the learned counsel, respondent nos. 4 & 6 are not necessary party in this
case.
As prayed for, let the name of respondent nos. 4 & 6 be struck off from the list of
respondents at the risk of the applicant.
Registry shall make necessary correction thereof.
This is an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act read with under Section
173(1) proviso of Motor Vehicle Act 1988 for condonation the delay of 22 days in preferring
the connected appeal which is directed against the judgment and award dated 01.03.2017
passed by the learned Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 1 Kamrup, Guwahati in
MAC Case No. 192/2012.
The reason for delay of 22 days in preferring the connected MAC Appeal has been
explained in paragraph 5 of the accompanying application. On perusal of the explanation
provided therein; upon hearing the learned counsels appearing for the parties, and also
taking note of the submission made by Ms. C. Mazumdar, learned counsel representing
respondent no. 7 that she has no objection if the delay of 22 days is condoned. I am of the
considered view that the applicant was prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the
connected MAC Appeal within the stipulated time. Accordingly, delay of 22 days in preferring
connected MAC Appeal is hereby condoned.
Registry shall register the connected MAC Appeal and list it for admission.
Page No.# 4/4
I.A. stands disposed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!