Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 221 Gua
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010120562019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2298/2019
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD ULUBARI,
GUWAHATI- 781007, REP. BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER, GAUHATI
REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI- 781007.
VERSUS
BHANIMA DAS AND 6 ORS.
W/O- LATE PRABIN KR. DAS, R/O- VILL.- PHEURAKHOWA, MOUZA-
DAMAKA CHAKA BAUSI, P.O. BHULUKADOBA, P.S. SORBHOG, DIST.-
BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781317.
2:BHITALI DAS
D/O- LATE PRABIN KR. DAS
R/O- VILL.- PHEURAKHOWA
MOUZA- DAMAKA CHAKA BAUSI
P.O. BHULUKADOBA
P.S. SORBHOG
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781317.
3:PAYAL DAS
D/O- LATE PRABIN KR. DAS
R/O- VILL.- PHEURAKHOWA
MOUZA- DAMAKA CHAKA BAUSI
P.O. BHULUKADOBA
P.S. SORBHOG
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781317.
Page No.# 2/4
4:SIDDHESWARI DAS
W/O- LATE NILORAM DAS
R/O- VILL.- PHEURAKHOWA
MOUZA- DAMAKA CHAKA BAUSI
P.O. BHULUKADOBA
P.S. SORBHOG
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781317.
5:JAGANNATH DAS
S/O- LATE NILORAM DAS
(OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 2 AND 3 ARE REP. BY OPP. PARTY NO. 1)
R/O- VILL.- PHEURAKHOWA
MOUZA- DAMAKA CHAKA BAUSI
P.O. BHULUKADOBA
P.S. SORBHOG
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781317.
7:LAXMAN MAZUMDAR (OWNER)
S/O- AJIT KR. MAZUMDAR
R/O- WARD NO. 1
SUBHAS NAGAR
P.S. AND P.O.- BASUGAON
DIST.- CHIRANG
BTAD
ASSAM
PIN- 783372
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R D MOZUMDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D NANDI
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 25.01.2021
Heard Ms. C. Mozumdar, learned counsel for the applicant.
None appears for the respondents, though the names of the learned
counsels representing the respondents have been shown in the Cause
list.
This is an application under Second Proviso to Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for
condonation of delay of 88 days in preferring the connected MAC appeal,
which has been directed against the judgment & award dated
27.11.2018, passed in MAC Case No.79/2018, by the learned Member,
MACT, Barpeta.
The reason for delay of 88 days in preferring the connected MAC appeal
has been explained to be the late communication by the counsel for the
appellant about the judgment & award passed by the learned Tribunal,
which has been explained in paragraph Nos. 3 to 7 of the accompanying
application.
Upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and on perusal
of the explanation provided in paragraph Nos. 3 to 7 of the
accompanying application, I am satisfied that the applicant was
prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the connected appeal
within the stipulated period.
Page No.# 4/4
In view of the above, delay of 88 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
The I.A stands allowed and disposed of.
Let the connected MAC appeal be registered and listed it for
Admission after 2(two) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!