Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ambia Bibi vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 197 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 197 Gua
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Ambia Bibi vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors on 22 January, 2021
                                                                    Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010000912020




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/236/2020

         AMBIA BIBI
         W/O- APURUDDIN SK., R/O- VILL- HAKAMA PT-III, P.O. AND P.S. HAKAMA,
         DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM



         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.
         MINISTRY OF INDIAN RAILWAYS, GOVT. OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECY.,
         RAIL BHAVAN, RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI- 110001

         2:THE GENERAL MANAGER
          NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY ZONE
          (N.F.)
          MALIGAON
          GHY-12

         3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER AND COLLECTOR
          DHUBRI
          P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI
         ASSAM
          PIN- 783301

         4:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
         (L.A. BRANCH)
          DHUBRI
          P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI
          ASSAM
          PIN- 783301

         5:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL)
          BILASIPARA
          P.O. BILASIPARA
                                                                              Page No.# 2/5

             DIST.- DHUBRI
             ASSAM
             PIN- 783348

            6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
             BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE
             P.O. BILASIPARA
             DIST.- DHUBRI
            ASSAM
             PIN- 783348

            7:THE ASSTT. SETTLEMENT OFFICER
             BILASIPARA CIRCLE
             P.O. BILASIPARA
             DIST.- DHUBRI
            ASSAM
             PIN- 78334

Advocate for the Petitioner    : MR. M KHAN

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NF RLY

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (Oral) Date : 22-01-2021

Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. Also

heard Ms. S. Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, N. F. Railway, appearing for the

respondent No.2 and Ms. K. Phukan, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam, appearing for

the respondent Nos.3 to 7.

2. The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that out of the land measuring 2B-1K-

14Ls covered by K.M.Patta No.48 Dag No.81/71 situated at village Hakama Pt-III

under Bilasipara Revenue Circle, Dhubri, a plot of land measuring 2K-10L was earlier Page No.# 3/5

acquired in connection with L.A. Case No.23/2005-06 for construction of Railway line

in the sector "New Moyanguri to Jogighopa". Although compensation for the land

measuring 2K-10L was paid to her, yet, no jirat compensation was paid to the

petitioner on account of the standing trees/crops. Subsequently, after the coming

into effect of "The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013" another two L.A. cases being L.A. Case

No.12/2015-16 and L.A. Case No.1/2019-20 have been registered with a view to

acquire land measuring 1K-5L and 4K-13L respectively from the petitioner, being part

of the original plot of land measuring 2B-1K-14L, owned by her. According to Mr.

Khan, the respondents have neither paid compensation to the petitioner pertaining

to L.A. Case No.12/2015-16 and L.A. Case No.1/2019-20 nor has she been paid jirat

compensation in connection with L.A. Case No.22/2005-06. Hence, this writ petition.

3. It is also the submission of Mr. Khan that at this point of time all compensation

payable to the petitioner would have to be assessed as per the provision of the Act

of 2013.

4. Ms. Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, N.F.Railway, has referred to the

affidavit filed by the respondent No.2 admitting the claim of the petitioner and

submits that the matter is under process. Similar is the submission of Ms. Phukan,

learned Govt. Advocate, Assam, based on the affidavit filed by the respondent No.3.

5. I find from the record that the respondent No.2, i.e. the Deputy Chief

Engineer/Construction,Jogighopa/NF Railway, has filed an affidavit on 07.05.2020

making the following statements in paragraphs 6 and 7:-

Page No.# 4/5

"6. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph 4 of the writ petition, the deponent begs to state that Rails acquired land for construction of new BG Railway line fron New Maynaguri To Jogighopa new BG Railway Line Project. The land acquisition process has been done by concerned Deputy Commissioner of State Govt. as per their norms and procedure. Accordingly, Deputy Commissioner has estimated the valuation of land and Zirat for the area at this location against L.A. Case No.23-2005-06 (Phase No.35) and Railway has deposited the amount to Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri for the L.A. Case.

7. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph 5 of the writ petition, the deponent begs to state that additional land at this phase/location has been taken by Railway for unavoidable requirement for construction of Railway line. Accordingly, estimate for land compensation has been submitted by Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil), Bilasipara vide Letter No.BRS(LA)-6/2019/4 dated 14.02.2020 and payment has also been made vide L.A. Case No.12/2015-15 (Phase No.35) to Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri as estimated for the case."

6. In paragraph 10 of the said affidavit it has further been stated as follows :-

"10. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph 8 of the writ petition, the deponent begs to state that presently, Sub-Divisional Officer(Civil) & Land Acquisition Officer, Bilasipara has submitted the Additional L.A. estimate to Railway for left out land & Zirat in respect of land owner Ambia Bibi & others against L.A. Case No.1/2019-20 (Phase No.35) vide Letter No.BRS(LA)-6/2019/4 dated 14.02.2020. The said L.A. Estimate is under process for approval of competent authority of Railway. The estimated amount would be deposited on due approval of competent authority at this end."

7. From the stand taken by the Railway authorities it is evident that the matter Page No.# 5/5

regarding payment of just compensation to the petitioner is under process.

8. At this stage, learned counsel for all the parties have prayed for disposal of the

writ petition with a direction upon the respondents to expedite the process and take

the same to its logical end, as expeditiously as possible. I find the submission to be

reasonable and therefore, the same is accepted.

9. As such, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the claim, this writ

petition is being disposed of by issuing a direction upon the respondents to bring the

pending proceedings, as noticed above, pertaining to payment of compensation of

land and jirat to the petitioner, to its logical end as expeditiously as possible but not

later than six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

Writ petition stands closed.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter