Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs Gopal Chandra Dutta And 2 Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 1959 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1959 Gua
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/4 vs Gopal Chandra Dutta And 2 Ors on 24 August, 2021
                                                            Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010070442021




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1246/2021

         THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
         A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT
         1956. REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER
         ULUBARI
         GUWAHATI-7.


          VERSUS

         GOPAL CHANDRA DUTTA AND 2 ORS.
         S/O- LATE MANIK CH. DUTTA
         REP. BY - SMT. ARCHANA BARUAH DUTTA
         R/O- BONDA AMGAON
         P.S. CHANDRAPUR
         GUWAHATI-26
         DIST.- KAMRUP
         ASSAM

         2:MD. SAMIM AHMED
         S/O- MD. SAHIB JAAN
          R/O- C/O- ANSAR TYRE
          BG TINIALI
          NARENGI ROAD
         WARD NO. 49
          H/NO. 17
          GHY-20
          P.S. NOONMATI
          DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
         ASSAM.
          3:NIDHAN BISWAS
         S/O- SRI GOPAL BISWAS
          R/O- KUTHABARI
          P.O. BAGDOBA
          P.S. DHUPDHARA
                                                                           Page No.# 2/4

            DIST.- GOALPARA
            ASSAM
            ------------
            Advocate for : MR. S K GOSWAMI
            Advocate for : appearing for GOPAL CHANDRA DUTTA AND 2 ORS.


            Linked Case : MACApp./168/2021

            THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
            A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956. REP. BY ITS
            REGIONAL MANAGER, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-7.



            VERSUS

            GOPAL CHANDRA DUTTA AND 2 ORS.
            S/O- LATE MANIK CH. DUTTA, REP. BY - SMT. ARCHANA BARUAH DUTTA,
            R/O- BONDA AMGAON, P.S. CHANDRAPUR, GUWAHATI-26, DIST.-
            KAMRUP, ASSAM

            2:MD. SAMIM AHMED
             S/O- MD. SAHIB JAAN
             R/O- C/O- ANSAR TYRE
             BG TINIALI
             NARENGI ROAD
            WARD NO. 49
             H/NO. 17
             GHY-20
             P.S. NOONMATI
             DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
            ASSAM.

            3:NIDHAN BISWAS
             S/O- SRI GOPAL BISWAS
             R/O- KUTHABARI
             P.O. BAGDOBA
             P.S. DHUPDHARA
             DIST.- GOALPARA
            ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. S K GOSWAMI

Advocate for the Respondent :
                                                                      Page No.# 3/4


                                     BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                    ORDER

Date : 24.08.2021

The Court proceedings have been conducted through online court proceeding services.

Heard Mr. S.K. Goswami, learned counsel for the applicant-appellant.

This application has been filed seeking suspension of the operation of the judgment and award dated 16.12.2020 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 1, Kamrup (M), Guwahati ('the Tribunal', for short) in MAC Case no. 936/2014. By the said judgment and award, the learned Tribunal has awarded an amount of Rs. 14,39,300/- as compensation along with interest @ 7.5% p.a. from the date of filing the evidence of the claimant till payment. The connected appeal, MACApp Case no. 168/2021 has been preferred against the said judgment and award dated 16.12.2020 and the same has already been admitted for hearing.

Mr. Goswami has submitted that the claimant has sought compensation in respect of injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident which ultimately resulted in amputation of the claimant's left leg below the knee by operation. While assessing the compensation, the learned Tribunal despite holding that the income of the claimant was not proved, had taken as Rs. 8,000/- as his monthly income. Further the extent of permanent disability ought to have taken at 50% by taking resort to Schedule-I to the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923. He has further submitted that there ought not have been two heads - (a) pain and suffering, and (b) loss of amenities of life. Submitting as such, he has challenged the quantum of compensation.

Page No.# 4/4

Upon consideration of the projections made on behalf of the applicant- appellant, it is provided that the operation of the impugned judgment and award dated 16.12.2020 passed in MAC Case no. 936/2014 shall remain stayed, subject to deposit of 50% of the awarded amount by the applicant-appellant before the Registry within a period of 6 (six) weeks from today.

It is further provided that upon such deposit of 50% of the awarded amount, the claimant-respondent no. 1 is permitted to withdraw the said amount upon his due identification by their learned engaged counsel.

The interlocutory application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter