Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1926 Gua
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2021
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010084722021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3761/2021
M/S QUALITY COKE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY, INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES
ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT 309, (2ND
FLOOR), BAROOAH MARKET, T.R.P ROAD, FANCY BAZAR, GUWAHATI-
781001, ASSAM, AND MANUFACTURING PREMISES AT N.H 37, LALUNG
GAONG, SAWKUTCHI, GUWAHATI-781034, ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS
DIRECTOR SRI RAM PRAKASH GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O H.NO.
18, OPPOSITE HOTEL SHANKAR, AMRIT NAGAR PATH, NATUN BAZAR,
BASISTHA CHARIALI, GUWAHATI-29 (ASSAM), PIN-781029
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
THROUGH THE FINANCE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE TO THE
GOVT. OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, NEW DELHI-
110001
2:PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
AND CENTRAL EXCISE
GUWAHATI
GST BHAWAN
KEDAR ROAD
MACHKHOWA
GUWAHATI
PIN-781001
ASSAM
3:ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
CGST GUWAHATI-I DIVISION
CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE
GUWAHATI
GST BHAWAN
Page No.# 2/2
KEDAR ROAD
GUWAHATI
PIN-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D SAHU
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
ORDER
20.08.2021
Heard Mr. D Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S C Keyal, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Issue notice, returnable by six weeks.
3. Extra copies of the writ petition be furnished to the learned counsel for the respondents within three days.
4. In this writ petition, the petitioner claims for fixation of a special rate as regards the value addition by application dated 13.04.2021 in a situation where some of the connected appeals were decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment dated 22.04.2020.
5. In another writ petition in Jyothi Labs vs. Union of India & others where such application for fixation of a special rate was made within a period of one month from the date of the judgment of the Supreme Court, a proposition was laid down that such applications are required to be entertained on its own merit.
6. Mr. S C Keyal, learned counsel for the GST department points out that there is a difference in the factual matrix of this case to the extent that the application for fixation of special rate was not made within one month but in fact made almost after a year.
7. List after six weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!