Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs The Reliance General Insurance ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1515 Gua

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1515 Gua
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2021

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/4 vs The Reliance General Insurance ... on 23 April, 2021
                                                                   Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010086432019




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1355/2019

         DEBOJIT KONWAR AND 2 ORS.
         S/O- LATE SONESWAR KONWAR,
         R/O- BOGORIJENG, PULIBOR, P.O. AND P.S. GOLAGHAT, DIST.- GOLAGHAT,
         ASSAM, PIN- 785006.

         2: BHOBANI KONWAR
          S/O- LATE SONESWAR KONWAR

         R/O- BOGORIJENG
         PULIBOR
         P.O. AND P.S. GOLAGHAT
         DIST.- GOLAGHAT
         ASSAM
         PIN- 785006.

         3: DULUMONI PHUKAN
         W/O- SONESWAR PHUKAN
         R/O- NAOHOLIA
          PATHAR GAON
          P.O. BORJAN
          P.S. AND DIST.- GOLAGHAT
         ASSAM
          PIN- 785625

         VERSUS

         THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS
         RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., ANIL PLAZA, 5TH FLOOR,
         BESIDES IDBI BANK, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-5. (INSURER OF THE
         VEHICLE NO. AS-05-A-3741, 407 TRUCK).

         2:SRI BINOD KUMAR AGARWALA

          S/O- NAND LAL AGARWALA
                                                                              Page No.# 2/4


            VILL.- BOKIAL GAON
            P.O.- LETEKUJAN- 785613
            P.S. AND DIST.- GOLAGHAT
            (OWNER OF THE VEHICLE NO. AS-05-A-3741
            407 TRUCK).

            3:SRI NOGEN BORA

             S/O- LATE BAPURAM BORA

            VILL.- BOKIAL GAON
            P.O.- LETEKUJAN- 785613
            P.S. AND DIST.- GOLAGHAT. (DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE NO. AS-05-A-3741
            407 TRUCK)

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MS. S KHANIKAR

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A J SAIKIA




                                     BEFORE
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA

                                           ORDER

Date : 23-04-2021

Heard Ms. P. Baruah, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. A. J. Saikia,

learned counsel for the respondent No.1.

None appears for the respondents No.2 & 3, though the names of the learned counsels

for the respondents No.2 & 3 have been shown in the Cause list.

This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with

Section 173(1) proviso of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988(as amended) for condonation of delay

of 145 days in filing the connected MAC appeal, which has been directed against the

judgment and award dated 30.01.2018, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Golaghat in

MAC Case No.64/2011.

Page No.# 3/4

The delay of 145 days in filing the connected MAC appeal has been explained by the

applicants in paragraph No.4 of the accompanying application, wherein it has been stated

that the applicants/appellants could not file the connected MAC appeal within the stipulated

time due to financial constraint of the applicants/appellants.

Opposing the application for condonation of delay of 145 days in filing the connected

MAC appeal, on the ground of financial hardship of the applicants/appellants, the opposite

party No.1 in the affidavit-in-opposition filed has stated that the entire awarded amount

including the interest amounting to Rs.1,05,477/-(Rupees One lakhs Five thousand Four

hundred Seventy seven only) was paid to the applicants pursuant to the judgment and award

dated 30.01.2018, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Golaghat in MAC Case No.64/2011.

Therefore, the opposite party No.1 contends that the contention of the applicants that the

connected MAC appeal could not be preferred within the stipulated time, on the ground of

financial constraint cannot be accepted.

Having heard the learned counsels for the contesting parties and on consideration of

the rival contentions put forth, I am of view that just because an amount of Rs.1,05,477/-

(Rupees One lakhs Five thousand Four hundred Seventy seven only) in pursuance of the

judgment and award dated 30.01.2018, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Golaghat in

MAC Case No.64/2011 was paid to the applicants/appellants, the applicants/appellants could

not have been in a financial constraint, cannot be accepted inasmuch as despite having

received the aforesaid amount, the applicants/appellants could still be in a financial

constraint, for which it is quite possible that the same may have prevented the

applicants/appellants from preferring the connected MAC appeal within the stipulated time.

In that view of the matter, I am of the considered view that the application for Page No.# 4/4

condonation of delay of 145 days in filing the connected MAC appeal deserves to be allowed

and the same is accordingly, hereby allowed by condoning the delay of 145 days in filing the

connected MAC appeal.

Registry shall register the connected MAC appeal and list it for Admission hearing after

2(two) weeks, by showing the name of Mr. A. J. Saikia, learned counsel representing

respondent No.1 in the Cause list.

The I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter