Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sh. Narender Kumar Drall & Ors. vs State & Anr.
2020 Latest Caselaw 1473 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1473 Del
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2020

Delhi High Court
Sh. Narender Kumar Drall & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 4 March, 2020
$~39
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                        Date of decision: March 04, 2020
+      W.P.(CRL) 597/2020 and CRL.M.A. 4598/2020

       SH. NARENDER KUMAR DRALL & ORS. ..... Petitioners

                          Through      Mr. Mohit Auluck, Advocate
                                       alongwith petitioners in person

                          versus

       STATE & ANR.                                 ..... Respondents

                          Through      Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional
                                       Standing Counsel for the State
                                       with ASI Ramesh, P.S.: Mundka

                                       Respondent no.2/Complainant in
                                       person

CORAM:

       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

                          JUDGMENT

BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No. 403/2019, under Sections 325/354/354(B)/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at P.S.: Mundka and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioners and respondent no.2 are the family members. A dispute over a trivial issue led to the registration of the aforementioned FIR against the petitioners. Respondent no.2 is the only complainant.

The petitioners and respondent no.2 have submitted that they have settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Settlement dated 14th February, 2020.

The Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, has identified the petitioner as well as respondent no.2.

Respondent no.2 reiterates the aforesaid facts and submits that she has amicably settled her dispute without any pressure or coercion from any source whatsoever. Respondent no.2 has further submitted that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed and the petition is allowed.

In view of the above facts, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 403/2019, under Sections 325/354/354(B)/506/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Mundka and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition alongwith pending application is disposed of accordingly.

(BRIJESH SETHI) JUDGE MARCH 04, 2020/savita

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter