Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satghara Dharampura Residential ... vs State Government Of Nct Of Delhi ...
2020 Latest Caselaw 393 Del

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 393 Del
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2020

Delhi High Court
Satghara Dharampura Residential ... vs State Government Of Nct Of Delhi ... on 21 January, 2020
$~28

*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                           Date of Decision: 21.01.2020

+      W.P.(C) 4709/2019
       SATGHARA DHARAMPURA RESIDENTIAL WELFARE
       ASSOCIATION (REGD.)                    ..... Petitioner
                     Through: Ms. Manish Sharma, Adv.

                          versus

       STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
                                                  ..... Respondents
                   Through: Mr. Siddarth Agarwal, Adv. for
                   Ms.Sandhya Kohli, Adv. for R-2


       CORAM:
       HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
                                   JUDGMENT

: D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral)

1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:

"i. Issue a Writ/ Order, directing the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to file status report in respect to the said properties as mentioned in Para 8 of the present petition; and ii. Issue a Writ/ Order, directing the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to take action against all unauthorized construction in the said properties as mentioned in Para 8 of the present petition; and

iii. Issue a Writ/ Order, directing an independent agency like CBI/Anti Corruption Bureau to investigate the officers on duty in whose tenure the said illegal constructions took place/ are taking place; and/ or iv. Issue, any other Writ, Order, Direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as per para 8 of this writ petition, there are several illegal constructions carried out by respondents No.3 to 11 and the same are required to be demolished. The details of these constructions have been mentioned in para 8 as well as in Annexures B, C, D, E, etc. of the writ petition.

3. Having heard learned counsel for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the issue involved in this petition is primarily regarding demolition of illegal structures. The legality or otherwise of the constructions in question cannot be decided on the basis of annexures. Cogent reasons and valid evidences are required to be led by the petitioner before the concerned respondents.

4. We hereby direct respondent No.2 to decide the legality or otherwise of the constructions in question, after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the owners/occupiers of the properties as mentioned in para 8 of this writ petition. If the constructions are found illegal, the requisite action shall be taken in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policy applicable to the facts of the present case as early as possible and practicable.

5. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is hereby disposed of.

CHIEF JUSTICE

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

JANUARY 21, 2020 ns

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter