Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5044 Del
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 18.10.2019
+ W.P.(CRL) 2097/2019
GEETA RANI & ANR. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate
Versus
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ranbir Singh Kundu,
Additional Public Prosecutor for
State with Mr. Shivom Soharan
with SI Pramod Kumar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
JUDGMENT
BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL)
1. Petitioners are said to be senior citizens. Vide this petition, they are
seeking protection from respondent No.2- Kapil Kumar, who happens to
be their son, as they apprehend threat to their life from him.
2. Notice. Ld. APP for the State accepts notice.
3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits that
protection required will be provided to the petitioners.
4. Let Mobile number of Beat Constable, Division Officer as well as
SHO be provided to the petitioners forthwith so that in case of exigency,
petitioners can contact the concerned officials.
5. In view of above directions, learned counsel for petitioners does
not press this petition.
6. This petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.
(BRIJESH SETHI) JUDGE OCROBER 18, 2019 r
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!