Corsan Corviam Construccion S.A. vs Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes
2019 Latest Caselaw 5039 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5039 Del
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2019

Delhi High Court

Corsan Corviam Construccion S.A. vs Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes on 18 October, 2019

$~27
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                         Date of Decision: 18th October, 2019

+      W.P.(C) 11040/2019
       CORSAN CORVIAM CONSTRUCCION S.A. ..... Petitioner
                   Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari &
                   Mr. Rmashish, Advs.

                          versus

       COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES           ..... Respondent
                   Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with
                   Mr.Deepak Srivastava, Advs.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
                                    JUDGMENT

D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)

CM APPL.45550 /2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 11040/2019

1. The present writ petition has been preferred for getting refund under Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 2004"). The refund claimed pertains to the fourth quarter of Financial Year 2014-2015 for sum of ₹1,25,60,785/- with interest under Section 42 of the Act, 2004.

2. Having heard the counsel for both sides and looking into the facts and

circumstances of the case, it appears that numerous reasons have been stated in this writ petition for the aforesaid claim of refund with interest.

3. It appears that the respondent has not yet finally decided the aforesaid claim of refund raised by this petitioner.

4. We, therefore, direct the concerned respondent authority to decide the aforesaid claim of refund of this petitioner in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policy applicable to the facts of the present case and keeping in mind the principles propounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Mafatlal Industries Ltd., 1997 89 ELT 247 (SC) as early as possible and practicable within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of copy of this order passed by this Court.

5. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

CHIEF JUSTICE

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

OCTOBER 18, 2019 ns