Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd. Nadeem & Ors. vs The State Nct Of Delhi & Ors.
2017 Latest Caselaw 4767 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4767 Del
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2017

Delhi High Court
Mohd. Nadeem & Ors. vs The State Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 5 September, 2017
$~19
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+        W.P.(CRL) 1271/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13542/2017
         MOHD. NADEEM & ORS.                ..... Petitioners
                     Through Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate with
                     petitioner in person.

                             versus

         THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.                      ..... Respondents

                             Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with
                             ASI Om Parkash, P.S. Nagloi, Delhi.
                             Mr. Javed Ashrif Khan, Advocate for R-3 and
                             respondent No.3 in person.
         CORAM:
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

                             ORDER

% 05.09.2017

1. Status report has been filed.

2. Notice to respondent no. 3 also. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO ASI Om Parkash.

3. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.PC') for quashing of the FIR bearing No.124 registered on 13.04.2017 against them with Police Station Nangloi, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections 323/341/452/506/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.3.

4. Subsequently the respondent No.3 and the petitioners have amicably resolved and settled their all disputes by settlement deed dated

22.04.2017.

5. The petitioner No.1 is the brother of the son-in-law of the respondent No.3 and petitioner No.2 is a friend of petitioner No.1.

6. The respondent No.3 states that she had voluntarily settled and resolved their all disputes voluntarily with the petitioners without any force and coercion. She submits that she does not want to pursue the present FIR. She submits that the said FIR may be quashed.

7. Learned ASC through IO submits that the charge sheet has so far not been filed.

8. Since the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, no fruitful purpose would be served in pursuing the said FIR. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No.124 registered on 13.04.2017 against the petitioners with Police Station Nangloi, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections 323/341/ 452/506/34 IPC IPC and proceedings arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed.

9. The petition and application are disposed of accordingly.

10. DASTI.

VINOD GOEL, J.

SEPTEMBER 05, 2017 "sandeep"

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter