Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepak Kumar & Anr. vs The State Nct Of Delhi & Ors.
2017 Latest Caselaw 3785 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3785 Del
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2017

Delhi High Court
Deepak Kumar & Anr. vs The State Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 31 July, 2017
$~17
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+        CRL. M.C. 1893/2017 & Crl.M.A. 7741/2017
         DEEPAK KUMAR & ANR                        ..... Petitioners
                     Through       Mr.Ashish Sehrawat, Adv. with
                     petitioners in person.

                             versus

         THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS                 ..... Respondents
                       Through     Mr.Amit Chadha, APP for State with
                       SI Naveen, P.S. Sabzi Mandi.
                       Mr.Kapil Yadav, Adv. for R-2 & 3 along with
                       respondent no.2 & 3 in person.

         CORAM:
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

                             ORDER

% 31.07.2017

1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.PC') for quashing of the FIR bearing No. 248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections 354/341/323/506/34 IPC.

2. Status report filed in the court. Same is taken on record.

3. It is submitted that on 11th August, 2016 complainants/respondents No.2 and 3 being the counsel for opponents/Sarika, had appeared in the court of learned MM, Tis Hazari Courts, in a matrimonial dispute under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, titled as Sarika v. Deepak. When they were

coming out of the court after adjournment of the matter, an altercation took place between the complainants and the petitioners. Resultantly, the said FIR was lodged with Police Station Subzi Mandi.

4. Both the respondents No.2 and 3 are present and are duly identified by IO SI Naveen.

5. The parties have amicably settled their disputes in terms of Settlement dated 5th May, 2017, which is placed on record.

6. Both the respondents No.2 and 3 submit that they do not want to pursue with the said FIR. They submit that the FIR may be quashed.

7. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no purpose would be served in further pursuing with the FIR bearing No. 248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections 354/341/323/506/34 IPC. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No. 248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections 354/341/323/506/34 IPC and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed.

8. The petition is disposed of.

VINOD GOEL, J.

JULY 31, 2017/jitender

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter