Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Personage Security Services ... vs Rajwati & Ors.
2017 Latest Caselaw 3634 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3634 Del
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2017

Delhi High Court
M/S. Personage Security Services ... vs Rajwati & Ors. on 26 July, 2017
$~25
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                 Date of Decision:26th July, 2017

+     FAO 365/2016 and C.M. Appl. 28056/2016

      M/S. PERSONAGE SECURITY SERVICES & ORS...... Appellants
                   Through: Ms.Anjali Rajput, Advocate

                       versus

      RAJWATI & ORS.                                ..... Respondents
                   Through:        Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate
                                   Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocate for
                                   Mr.Sanjoy Gose, Advocate as amicus
                                   curiae.

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

                        JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The accident dated 2nd June, 2013 resulted in the death of Gajey Singh. Under Section 4A of the Employee's Compensation Act, the compensation amount had to be deposited by the appellants immediately when it fell due. However, the appellant defaulted in depositing compensation amount with the Commissioner, Employees' Compensation.

2. Respondents no.1 and 2 filed a claim application before the Commissioner, Employees' Compensation which was allowed on 26 th May, 2017 in pursuance to which the compensation amount was deposited by the appellants on 2nd August, 2016 and the same was disbursed by this Court

vide order dated 27th February, 2017.

3. Vide order dated 27th February, 2017, show cause notice was issued to the appellant to show cause as to why the penalty be not imposed under the proviso to Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employee's Compensation Act.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant deposited the compensation amount in terms of the order dated 26 th May, 2016. It is further submitted that the appellant incurred Rs.70,000/- towards the medical expenses as well as the expenses for transporting the dead body of the deceased to his home town after the accident. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that a lenient view be taken in imposing the penalty.

5. Respondents no.1 and 2 are present in Court and they submit that they received only Rs.5,000/- towards the expenses for transportation of the dead body.

6. Under the proviso to Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employee's Compensation Act, this Court is empowered to impose penalty upto 50% of the compensation amount i.e. Rs.2,30,050/-.

7. In the facts and circumstances of this case, the penalty of Rs.2 lakh is imposed on the appellants under the proviso to Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employee's Compensation Act. The appellants are granted four weeks time to deposit the penalty amount of Rs.2 lakh with State Bank of India, Pushp Vihar Branch by means of a cheque drawn in the name of State Bank of India A/c Rajwati.

8. Upon the aforesaid amount being deposited, State Bank of India, Pushp Vihar Branch shall release Rs.25,000/- to Rajwati by transferring the same to her savings bank A/c No.1211000100789495 with Punjab National Bank, Branch Babri (UP), Village and P.O.: Babri, Distt. Muzaffarnagar-

251305 (IFSC Code: PUNB0121100).

9. The balance amount of Rs.1,75,000/- be kept in 7 FDRs of Rs.25,000/- each for the period 1 year to 7 years respectively with cumulative interest.

10. The original FDRs shall remain with State Bank of India, Pushp Vihar Branch. However, the statement giving the particulars of the FDR number, amount, date of maturity and maturity amount be furnished to respondent No.1.

11. The maturity amount of each FDR be transferred to the savings bank account of respondent No.1 along with interest thereon.

12. No loan or advance or pre-mature discharge of FDR be permitted to respondent No. 1 without permission of this Court.

13. No cheque book or debit card be issued to the respondent No.1 without permission of this Court. However, in case the debit card and/or cheque book have already been issued, the Punjab National Bank, Branch Babri (UP), Village and P.O.: Babri, Distt. Muzaffarnagar-251305 is directed to cancel them.

14. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that State Bank of India, Pushp Vihar Branch has not issued the statement containing the particulars of 120 FDRs number, amount, date of maturity and maturity amount to respondent no.1 in terms of para 12 of the order dated 27th February, 2017. State Bank of India, Pushp Vihar Branch is again directed to furnish the statement containing the particulars of 120 FDRs as well as 7 FDRs directed to be issued today namely, FDR number, FDR amount, date of maturity and maturity amount to respondent no.1 within a period of one week from today. Copy of the statement be also sent to this Court before the next date of

hearing.

15. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. The pending application is disposed of.

16. List for reporting compliance on 13th September, 2017.

17. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

18. Copy of this order as well as order dated 27th July, 2017 be sent to State Bank of India, Pushp Vihar Branch for compliance.

JULY 26, 2017                                        J.R. MIDHA, J.
dk





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter