Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3608 Del
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ EX.F.A. No. 6/2016
% 25th July, 2017
M/S S R ENGEERNING CONSTRUCTION ..... Appellant
Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Prashanta Varma, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
EX.F.A. 6/2016 and C.M. Appl. No. 6093/2016 (for stay)
1. By this execution first appeal the decree holder impugns
the order of the executing court dated 18.1.2016 whereby the
executing court has dismissed the execution petition with costs of
Rs.2,50,000/- for deliberately filing wrong calculations in the court for
the amount due under the decree.
2. No one appeared for the appellant on the first call. No
one appears for the appellant even on the second call.
3. A perusal of the record shows that the appellant/decree
holder deliberately calculated interest payable at 18% per annum
instead of 9% per annum as granted by the award and resultantly the
execution amount was illegally enhanced to Rs.1.70 crores.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1/Union of India
states that on account of the deliberate false calculation the account of
the Central Government was wrongly attached on two occasions.
5. The court below has also dismissed the execution petition
on account of deliberate wrong calculation, however, I may note that
dismissal of an execution petition on technical grounds does not
operate as res judicata barring filing of fresh execution petition.
6. In view of the above, there is no merit in the appeal and
the same is hereby dismissed.
JULY 25, 2017 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J AK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!