Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

North East Region Finservice ... vs Oriental Bank Of Commerce
2017 Latest Caselaw 549 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 549 Del
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2017

Delhi High Court
North East Region Finservice ... vs Oriental Bank Of Commerce on 30 January, 2017
$~28
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      W.P.(C) 834/2017 & CMs No.3805 & 3806/2017
       NORTH EAST REGION FINSERVICE LIMITED ..... Petitioner
                           Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Rudra Nath
                           Sinha, Ms. Rashmita Roy Choudhury, Mr. Lokesh
                           Chopra, Advocates.

                           versus

       ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE                   .... Respondent
                    Through: Ms. Ekta Sikri, Ms. Adwaita Sharma,
                    Advocates along with Mr. Ashok K. Sharma,
                    AGM/AR of the respondent/Bank

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

                           ORDER

% 30.01.2017

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for issuance of a writ of mandamus to the respondent for granting it further time to sell the property proposed to be auctioned by them in terms of the order dated 21.5.2016 passed by the Lok Adalat wherein the parties had arrived at a settlement.

2. Ms. Sikri, learned counsel who appears on an advance notice states on instructions that the settlement had fallen through on account of failure on the part of the petitioner to abide by the undertakings recorded in the settlement and the said decision was duly communicated by the respondent. Only thereafter was it decided to auction the subject property. She however

states that though the auction has been fixed for tomorrow, at a reserve price of Rs.1,72,00,000/, till today, nobody has shown any interest in participating in the auction.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the respondent/Bank with a fresh proposal for a One Time Settlement.

4. Leave, as prayed for is granted. The petitioner is permitted to approach the respondent/Bank with a fresh proposal for a One Time Settlement. If the respondent receives such a proposal, it shall consider the same in accordance with law and convey a decision to the petitioner within four weeks from the date of receipt.

5. The petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications.

HIMA KOHLI, J JANUARY 30, 2017 ap

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter