Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Gayatri Devi & Ors.
2017 Latest Caselaw 4250 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4250 Del
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2017

Delhi High Court
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Gayatri Devi & Ors. on 18 August, 2017
$~R-119
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                        Decided on: 18th August, 2017
+      MAC APPEAL No. 520/2009 & CM Nos. 14931-33/2009

       NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.         ..... Appellant
                    Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv.

                          versus

       SMT. GAYATRI DEVI & ORS.                       ..... Respondents
                     Through: None.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

                      JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The only contention pressed by the insurance company in this appeal is to seek recovery rights on the ground that there was breach of terms and conditions of the insurance policy by the registered owner of the vehicle (eighth respondent), since the vehicle was registered in the State of Haryana, the accident having taken place in Delhi, the plea of insurance company being that there was no valid permit.

2. It is noted that the insurance company had due notice and had even participated in the inquiry before the tribunal. It did not seek any opportunity to lead evidence to above effect. It has now come up with an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) (CM No. 14933/2009), seeking such

opportunity on the ground that its counsel did not lead evidence, such omission "neither being intentional nor deliberate".

3. The provision of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC is not available for the asking. The insurance company has not shown any good reasons why the opportunity was earlier not availed. There being no proof of due diligence, such opportunity ought not be granted at this stage, twelve years after the proceedings began before the tribunal.

4. The appeal with pending applications is dismissed.

5. The insurance company had been directed, by order dated 26.10.2009, to deposit the awarded amount with interest with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch. The amount, if still lying in deposit, shall now be released to the claimants.

6. The statutory amount shall be refunded.

R.K.GAUBA, J.

AUGUST 18, 2017 nk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter