Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

United India Insurance Company ... vs [email protected] & Ors
2016 Latest Caselaw 6514 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6514 Del
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2016

Delhi High Court
United India Insurance Company ... vs [email protected] & Ors on 18 October, 2016
$~17
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                               Date of Decision:18th October, 2016
+      MAC.APP. 640/2016 & CM No.29816/2016 (Stay)

       UNITED INDIA INSURANCE
       COMPANY LIMITED                                 .... Appellant
                     Through: Mr. Amit               Kumar Singh,
                              Advocate

                         Versus

       [email protected] & ORS                ..... Respondents
                    Through: Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti and Mr. S.S.
                              Rathi, Advocates
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

                       JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.23,15,600/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents No.1 to 4.

2. The accident dated 3rd February 2013 resulted in the death of Pappu Kumar. The deceased was aged 41 years at the time of the accident and was working as a driver on contract basis earning Rs.12,000/- per month. The deceased was survived by his wife and three minor children, who filed the claims petition before the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal added 30% towards future prospects of the deceased, deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 14. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1 lakh towards loss of love and affection, Rs.1 lakh towards loss of consortium, Rs.1

lakh towards loss of estate and Rs.50,000/- towards funeral expenses. Total compensation awarded is Rs.23,15,600/-.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of hearing of appeal that the future prospects should not be taken into consideration and the compensation awarded under the heads of love and affection, consortium and estate be reduced.

4. On careful consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, the Court is of the view that the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal is just, fair and reasonable. The Claims Tribunal has rightly awarded the future prospects @ 30% to the respondents. The compensation awarded under the heads of loss of love and affection, consortium and estate are also just, fair and reasonable.

5. The appeal is dismissed. The appellant has deposited Rs.26,13,479/- with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court branch in terms of order dated 17th August 2016.

6. UCO Bank, Delhi High Court branch is directed to keep a sum of Rs.25 lakhs in fixed deposit in the following manner:-

Sr.    Duratio        Resp. 1          Resp. 2                  Resp. 3                    Resp. 4
No.     n of        Subhadara          Sumit                    Soniya                    Mayank
        FDR            (Wife)           (Son)                 (Daughter)                    (Son)
                        FDR          FDR amount               FDR amount                 FDR amount
                      amount            (Rs.)                    (Rs.)                      (Rs.)
                        (Rs.)
1.      1 yr         1,00,000/-   Rs.5,00,000/- be kept    Rs.5,00,000/- be kept      Rs.5,00,000/- be kept
                                  in FDR till he attains   in FDR till she attains    in FDR till he attains
2.      2 yrs       1,00,000/-    the age of majority.     the age of majority.       the age of majority.
3.      3 yrs       1,00,000/-
                                  On           attaining   On attaining majority      On attaining majority
4.      4 yrs       1,00,000/-    majority,                Rs.1,00,000/- shall be     Rs.1,00,000/- shall be
                                  Rs.1,00,000/- shall be   released and balance       released and balance
5.      5 yrs       1,00,000/-    released and balance     Rs.4,00,000/- be kept      Rs.4,00,000/- be kept





 6.       6 yrs      1,00,000/-    Rs.4,00,000/- be kept   in 4 FDRs of equal       in 4 FDRs of equal
                                  in 4 FDRs of equal      amount for a period      amount for a period
7.       7 yrs      1,00,000/-    amount for a period     of 1 year, 2 years, 3    of 1 year, 2 years, 3
                                  of 1 year, 2 years, 3   years and 4 years.       years and 4 years.
8.       8 yrs      1,00,000/-
                                  years and 4 years.
9.       9 yrs      1,00,000/-
10.     10 yrs      1,00,000/-

      TOTAL         10,00,000/-        5,00,000/-              5,00,000/-               5,00,000/-
                            GRAND TOTAL                                                25,00,000/-


7. The balance amount, after keeping Rs.25 lakhs in fixed deposit, be released to respondent No.1 by transferring the said amount in savings bank account No.20780110097410, UCO Bank, Karkardooma Court Branch, Delhi.

8. The monthly interest on all the FDRs shall be paid to respondent No.1 by transferring the said amount to her individual savings bank account.

9. At the time of maturity, the fixed deposit amount shall be automatically credited in the savings bank accounts of the claimants/beneficiaries.

10. All the original FDRs shall be retained by UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch. However, the photocopies of the same shall be provided to the respondent No.1.

11. No cheque book or debit card be issued to the respondent No.1 without permission of this Court.

12. No loan or advance or pre-mature discharge shall be permitted without the permission of this Court.

13. The respondent No.1 shall approach the UCO Bank for completing the formalities for the disbursement of the award amount

in terms of this order.

14. UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch shall ensure that the savings bank account of respondent No.1 is individual account and not joint account.

15. Respondent No.1 is at liberty to approach this Court for release of further amount in case of any financial exigency.

16. The statutory amount be refunded back to the appellant.

17. CM No.29816/2016 is disposed of.

18. Copy of this judgment be given dasti to counsels for the parties under signatures of the Court Master.

OCTOBER 18, 2016                                       J.R. MIDHA, J.
Aj





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter