Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yogesh Singh And Ors. vs The Union Of India And Ors.
2016 Latest Caselaw 3526 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3526 Del
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2016

Delhi High Court
Yogesh Singh And Ors. vs The Union Of India And Ors. on 11 May, 2016
Author: Hima Kohli
$~5
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+     W.P.(C) 1624/2016 & C.M. No. 7034/2016
      YOGESH SINGH AND ORS.                              ..... Petitioners
                         Through: Mr. B.C. Bhatt, Advocate

                         versus

      THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.                ..... Respondents
                    Through: Mr. G.C. George, Advocate with
                    Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
                   ORDER

% 11.05.2016

1. Four petitioners have jointly filed the present petition praying

inter alia for issuing directions to the respondent No.1 /SSC to permit

them to undergo the basic training for the post of Constable (GD) in

CAPFs and Rifleman (GD) under respondents No.2 to 5/

BSF/CISF/CRPF/SSB, pursuant to an advertisement issued in

February 2011.

2. When the case was listed for admission on 09.3.2016, having

regard to fact that the posts in question were advertised in February

2011 and the results were declared as long back as in November

2011, it was deemed appropriate to direct the petitioners in the first

instance to file their affidavits explaining the unreasonable delay in

approaching the Court for relief. However, the said affidavits have not

been filed despite two opportunities granted in that regard.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that in any case, it

would be a futile exercise to entertain the present petition for the

reason that the posts advertised in February 2011 have already been

filled up and there is no vacancy available.

4. In view of the aforesaid position and having regard to the fact

that the petitioners have failed to explain the inordinate delay in

approaching the Court for relief, we are not inclined to entertain the

present petition, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending

application.

HIMA KOHLI, J

SUNIL GAUR, J MAY 11, 2016 ap

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter