Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unison Developers Private ... vs ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 4622 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4622 Del
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2016

Delhi High Court
Unison Developers Private ... vs ... on 19 July, 2016
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                  COMPANY PETITION NO. 373/2015

                                            Reserved on 10th May, 2016
                                Date of pronouncement: 19th July, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:

Unison Developers Private Limited
                                           Petitioner/Transferor Company
      WITH

Unison Infratech Private Limited
                                          Petitioner/Transferee Company

                               Through Mr. V.V. Manoharan with
                               Mr.Awanish Kumar and Ms. Rupbala,
                               Advocates for the petitioners
                               Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
                               of Companies for the Regional Director
                               Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
                               Official Liquidator

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of

the Scheme of Amalgamation of Unison Developers Private Limited

(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) with Unison Infratech

Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company).

2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies

are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The transferor company was originally incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 20th October, 2003 with the Registrar of

Companies, U.P. & Uttaranchal at Kanpur. The company shifted its

registered office from the state of Uttarakhand to Delhi and obtained a

certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi &

Haryana at New Delhi on 26th August, 2014.

4. The transferee company was incorporated under the Companies

Act, 1956 on 23rd October, 2008 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of

Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

5. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company is

Rs.1,00,00,000/- divided into 10,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

The present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the

company is Rs.64,62,500/- divided into 6,46,250 equity shares of Rs.10/-

each.

6. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is

Rs.1,00,00,000/- divided into 10,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

The present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the

company is Rs.90,86,000/- divided into 9,08,600 equity shares of Rs.10/-

each.

7. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record. The

audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor and

transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, and the

provisional accounts of the transferor and transferee companies, as on

30th November, 2014, have also been filed.

8. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted by

the petitioners that since both companies are engaged in same line of

business, the proposed amalgamation will consolidate their business

operations and provide significant impetus to their growth. It is claimed

that the proposed amalgamation will result in reduction of overheads,

administrative, managerial and other expenditure and bring about

operational rationalization, efficiency and lead to optimal utilization of

resources.

9. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that 27.68% of the share capital representing 2,51,500 equity

shares of the transferee company is held by the transferor company.

Therefore, no shares of the transferee company shall be allotted to the

extent of transferor's company holding in the transferee company. It is

further provided that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the

transferee company shall issue and allot equity shares to the

shareholders of the transferor company in the following ratio:

"166 equity shares of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid-up, for every 100 fully paid- up equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company."

10. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the

petitioner companies.

11. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies

in their separate meetings held on 15th December, 2014 have

unanimously approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies

of the Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the

transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.

12. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 28/2015

seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of

convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 14th May, 2015 this court

allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening

and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders and unsecured

creditors of the transferor and transferee companies, there being no

secured creditors of the petitioner companies, to consider and, if thought

fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation.

13. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 28th

July, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations

were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and

(Hindi) Delhi editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioners

showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator and the

Regional Director (Northern Region) and also regarding publication of

citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 21st August, 2015 and 22nd

August, 2015 respectively. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing

the publications have been filed along with the said affidavit.

14. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 4th January, 2016

wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party interested in

the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the transferor company

do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the

interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as per second proviso

of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

15. Although the Official Liquidator has not raised any objection to the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation but in para 9 of his report he has

submitted that the transferor company has filed an appeal before the

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the order of assessment

dated 29.03.2014 made under Section 143(3)/148 of the Income Tax Act

for the assessment year 2008-09. In response to the aforesaid

observation, the applicant companies in the affidavit dated 12th January,

2016 of Mr. Amit Agarwal, authorized signatory of the transferor

company, while referring to para 12.1 of the Scheme, has submitted that

the transferee company undertakes to have all legal or other proceedings

initiated by or against the transferor company referred to in clause 12.1 of

the Scheme, transferred in its name and to have the same continued,

prosecuted and enforced by or against the transferee company, to the

exclusion of the transferor company. In view of the aforesaid, the

observation made by the Official Liquidator stands satisfied.

16. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.

Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 23rd March, 2016 stating that the ROC in

his report has not made any adverse comments against the Scheme of

Amalgamation and that the Regional Director has no objection to the

proposed Scheme.

17. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavits dated 8th

April, 2016 of Mr. Amit Aggarwal, director of the transferor company and

Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, director of the transferee company have submitted

that neither the petitioner companies nor their counsel have received any

objection pursuant to the citations published in the newspapers on 21st

August, 2015 and 22nd August, 2015.

18. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and

creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern

Region and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment

to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,

sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under

Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner

companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with

law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies

within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as

an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in

accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the

appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor

company shall stand dissolved without undergoing the process of winding

up.

19. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at

least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the

fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and

also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company

states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order

dated 10.05.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by

way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.

20. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

July 19, 2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter