Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 832 Del
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2016
$~2.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 717/2016
SHIVANK CHATURVEDI ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with
Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER
% 03.02.2016
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying
inter alia for directions to the respondents to re-examine him
medically at Delhi on the ground that vide letter dated 19.08.2015, he
was informed that he was found unfit for enrolment in the Navy on the
ground of suffering from Chronic Septum Otitis Media (Right Ear).
2. Learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance
notice, opposes the maintainability of the present petition on the
ground that though the petitioner has an equally efficacious alternate
remedy of seeking a Review Medical Board, he has directly approached
this Court, which is impermissible.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that the petitioner
has not requested the respondents to hold a Review Medical Board to
examine his medical condition and states that he shall do so at the
earliest.
4. On receiving the said representation, the same shall be
considered by the respondents and they shall intimate the petitioner in
writing the date and time for appearing before the Review Medical
Board to be held at R&R Hospital, Delhi.
5. If the opinion of the Review Medical Board favours the petitioner,
then the respondents shall take further steps in accordance with law,
failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to seek his remedies in
accordance with law.
6. The petition is disposed of.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J FEBRUARY 03, 2016 rkb/ap
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!