Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rahul Sharma vs Lite Bite Travel Foods Pvt. Ltd.
2016 Latest Caselaw 783 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 783 Del
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2016

Delhi High Court
Rahul Sharma vs Lite Bite Travel Foods Pvt. Ltd. on 2 February, 2016
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
$~5
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+     CO.PET. 678/2015
      RAHUL SHARMA                                  ..... Petitioner
                         Through: Mr. R.L. Bhatia, Advocate

                         versus

      LITE BITE TRAVEL FOODS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
                    Through: Mr. Arpan and Mr. Pankaj, Advocates

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
                   ORDER

% 02.02.2016

1. The learned counsel for the respondent says that the amount claimed in the present petition is Rs.1,89,108/-.

2. The learned counsel for the respondent says that he has brought a demand draft bearing no.541043, dated 21.12.2015, drawn on Yes Bank, in favour of Image Design, which is the proprietorship concern of the petitioner, in the sum of Rs.1,79,608/-. 2.1 The learned counsel says that the said sum has been arrived at after adjusting the withholding tax from the total sum claimed by the petitioner, as indicated above.

2.2 The learned counsel for the respondent says that he is also willing to furnish the TDS certificate to the counsel for the petitioner for the amount adjusted.

3. Mr. Bhatia, who appears for the petitioner, however, says that CO.PET. 678/2015 page 1 of 3 the project was completed in February 2014 and therefore, some amount of interest should also be paid.

3.1 The learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, says that the accounts stood reconciled only in, May 2015, and therefore, if at all the respondent is to pay interest, it could be called upon to pay interest for the period commencing May 2015. 3.2 Accordingly, the counsel for the respondent offers to pay interest at the rate of 9% p.a. for 8 months.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable to the aforesaid offer made by the counsel for the respondent.

5. Accordingly, the company petition is disposed of, with the following agreed directions :-

(i). The petitioner's counsel will pay a total sum of Rs.1,89,108/- after deduction of tax at source.

(ii). In respect of payment stipulated in clause (i) above, the demand draft, the details of which are given hereinabove, is accepted by the counsel for the petitioner.

(iii). The respondent will issue requisite TDS certificates to the petitioner within two weeks of deposit of the withholding tax if, not already deposited. If withholding tax has been deposited, the requisite certificate will be issued within two weeks from today.

(iv). The respondent will remit monies, to the petitioner, in respect of the interest amount calculated at the rate of 9% p.a. for a period of 8 months on Rs.1,89,108/-. The said amount shall be paid within one week from today.

CO.PET. 678/2015 page 2 of 3

6. With the aforesaid observations in place, the captioned petition is disposed of.



                                            RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2016
Yg


CO.PET. 678/2015                                               page 3 of 3
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter