Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sugam Exim Pvt. Ltd. vs --
2016 Latest Caselaw 737 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 737 Del
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2016

Delhi High Court
Sugam Exim Pvt. Ltd. vs -- on 1 February, 2016
$~38
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      CO.APPL.(M) 16/2016
       IN THE MATTER OF :
       SUGAM EXIM PVT LTD
                            ....APPLICANT/TRANSFEROR COMPANY NO.1
       UNICRAFT MERCHANDISE PVT. LTD.
                            ....APPLICANT/TRANSFEROR COMPANY NO.2
       CRAZY MERCHANDISE PVT. LTD.
                            ....APPLICANT/TRANSFEROR COMPANY NO.3
       CAREFUL MERCHANTS PVT. LTD.
                            ....APPLICANT/TRANSFEROR COMPANY NO.4
                   AND
       ATLAS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
                                ....APPLICANT/TRANSFEREE COMPANY
                   Through: Mr. Rajeev Goel, Advocate for the petitioners
                   Mr. Rajiv Behl, Advocate for the OL
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
                    ORDER

% 01.02.2016

1. This is a joint application moved under Section 391 and 394 read with Section 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short the 1956 Act).

2. The joint application is, in fact the first motion, which has been moved, in connection with the scheme of arrangement which envisages, broadly, the following :-

(i). The amalgamation of transferor company no.1, 2, 3 and 4 (collectively referred to as the transferor companies) with the transferee company.

(ii). Re-arrangement / reduction of the share capital of the transferee company, post the merger.

3. To be noted, the registered office of the transferor companies and the transferee company is located within the territorial jurisdiction of this court.

4. The authorised, issued, subscribed and paid up capital of the transferor companies and the transferee company is adverted to in the joint application.

5. The applicants have averred that there are no proceedings pending qua them under Section 235 to 251 of the 1956 Act.

5.1 The position with regard to the consents obtained qua equity shareholders and the unsecured creditors of the transferor companies as averred is as follows :-

Company      No. of    Consent     No. of Un- Consent
             Share     Given       secured    Given
             holders               Creditors

Transferor   3         All         1           All
Company

Transferor   3         All         1           All
Company

Transferor   2         All         1           All
Company

Transferor   2         All         1           All
Company






 5.2    In so far as the transferee company is concerned, the position with

regard to consent obtained from equity shareholders, the secured and unsecured creditors stated in the joint application is as follows :-

Company    No. of      Consent     No. of      Consent     No. of Un- Consent
           Share       Given       secured     Given       secured    Given
           holders                 Creditors               Creditors

Transferee 28          26          7           All         152         79
Company


6. I have examined the consent letters. The transferor companies have consents of all equity shareholders and unsecured creditors. It is averred that the transferor companies do not have any secured creditors. This statement is taken on record.

7. In so far as the transferee company is concerned, it has consent of 26 out of 28 equity shareholders and 79 out of 152 unsecured creditors. In terms of value, 96.36% of the equity shareholders have given their consent. As regards, consents obtained in numbers, 92.86% of the total number of shareholders have given their consent.

7.1 In so far as the unsecured creditors are concerned, in terms of value 91.76% have given their consent which, in numbers, works out to 51.97%. 7.2. As regards, secured creditors of the transferee company, all have given their consent.

8. Having regard to the aforesaid, the prayers made in the joint application are allowed. The requirement to convene meetings of equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the transferor companies is dispensed with, since all consents are in place. Similarly, the prayer made for dispensing with the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors of the transferee company is allowed as well.

10. The reason that I am dispensing with the meetings of the equity shareholders and the unsecured creditors of the transferee company, is that, in terms of value, those who have given their consent are more than 3/4th of the total value of the paid up equity share capital and the total amount outstanding qua the unsecured creditors, as on 31.03.2015.

11. The application is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY 01, 2016 yg

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter