Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Marvel Institute Of Technology ... vs ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 5616 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5616 Del
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2016

Delhi High Court
Marvel Institute Of Technology ... vs ... on 29 August, 2016
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                  COMPANY PETITION NO. 109/2016
                                          Reserved on 3rd August, 2016
                              Date of pronouncement: 29th August, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391(2) & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
Marvel Institute of Technology Private Limited
                                Non-Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
Shiva Infosystem Private Limited
                               Non-Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
New Ways Buildwell Private Limited
                                     Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 3
      WITH
Yuga Estate Private Limited
                                     Non-Petitioner/Transferee Company
                                Through Mr. Naresh Kumar and Mr. R.
                                Khanna, Advocates for the petitioner
                                Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
                                of Companies for the Regional Director
                                Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Advocate for the
                                Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This petition has been filed under Sections 391(2) & 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner/transferor company no. 3 seeking

sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Marvel Institute of

Technology Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor

company no. 1); Shiva Infosystem Private Limited (hereinafter referred to

as the transferor company no. 2); and New Ways Buildwell Private

Limited (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner/transferor company no.3)

with Yuga Estate Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee

company).

2. The registered office of the petitioner/transferor company no. 3 is

situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court. However, the

registered offices of the transferor companies no. 1 & 2 and the

transferee company are situated at Haryana, outside the jurisdiction of

this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a similar

petition has been filed by the transferor companies no. 1 & 2 and the

transferee company before the court of competent jurisdiction for

sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation.

3. The petitioner/transferor company no. 3 was incorporated under

the Companies Act, 1956 on 16th March, 2005 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

4. The authorized share capital of the petitioner/transferor company

no. 3 is Rs.10,00,000/- divided into 1,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-

each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company

is Rs.9,50,000/- divided into 95,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

5. A copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

petitioner/transferor company no. 3 has been filed on record. The audited

balance sheet, as on 31st March, 2015, of petitioner/transferor company

no. 3, along with the report of the auditors, has also been filed.

6. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by

the applicants that the proposed amalgamation would enable pooling of

physical, financial and human resources of these companies for their

most beneficial utilization in the combined entity. It is further claimed that

the proposed amalgamation will result in usual economies of a

centralized and a large company including elimination of duplicate work,

reduction in overheads, better and more productive utilization of human

and other resource and enhancement of overall business efficiency. It

will enable these Companies to combine their managerial and operating

strength, to build a wider capital and financial base and to promote and

secure overall growth of their businesses.

7. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee

company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the

transferor companies in the following ratio:

"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 33 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 1."

"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 08 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 2."

"07 equity shares of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 04 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 3."

8. It has been submitted by the petitioner that no proceedings under

Sections 235 and 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against

the petitioner/transferor company no. 3.

9. The Board of Directors of the petitioner/transferor company no. 3 in

their meeting held on 7th November, 2015 have unanimously approved

the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. A copy of the Resolution passed

at the meeting of the Board of Directors of petitioner/transferor company

no. 3 has been placed on record.

10. The petitioner/transferor company no. 3 had earlier filed CA (M)

No. 13/2016 seeking directions of this court to dispense with the

requirement of convening the meetings of its equity shareholders,

secured and unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for

sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 22nd January,

2016, this court allowed the application and dispensed with the

requirement of convening and holding the meetings of the equity

shareholders and unsecured creditors of the petitioner/transferor

company no. 3, there being no secured creditor of the petitioner

company, to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without

modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.

11. The petitioner/transferor company no. 3 has thereafter filed the

present petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide

order dated 12th February, 2016, notice in the petition was directed to be

issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official

Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be published in 'Business

Standard' (English) and 'Jansatta' (Hindi) Delhi editions. Affidavit of

service has been filed by the petitioner showing compliance regarding

service on the Official Liquidator and the Regional Director, Northern

Region and also regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid

newspapers on 31st March, 2016. Copies of the newspaper clippings

containing the publications have been filed along with the said affidavit.

12. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner company. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 28th July, 2016

wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party interested in

the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the transferor company

do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the

interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as per second proviso

of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

13. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. Narender

Kumar Bhola, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 28th July, 2016 stating that the Regional

Director has no objection to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.

14. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner company in the affidavit dated 30th

July, 2016 of Ms. Komal Jain, Director of the petitioner company, has

submitted that neither the petitioner company nor their counsel have

received any objection pursuant to the citations published in the

newspapers on 31st March, 2016.

15. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and

creditors of the petitioner company to the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation, and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern

Region, and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment

to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,

subject to sanction of the Scheme in respect of the transferor companies

no. 1 and 2 and the transferee company from the court of competent

jurisdiction, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation

under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner

company will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with

law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies

within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as

an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in

accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the

appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2015, the

petitioner/transferor company no. 3 shall stand dissolved without

undergoing the process of winding up.

16. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at

least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioner keeping in view the

fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and

also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company

states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order

dated 03.08.2016, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by

way of costs with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Lawyers Social

Security and Welfare Fund, New Delhi.

17. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

August 29, 2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter