Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 8112 Del
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2015
$-R-42
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DECIDED ON : 28th OCTOBER, 2015
+ CRL.A.623/2013
MOHAN ..... Appellant
Through : Mr.Biswajit Kumar Patra,
Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI) ..... Respondent
Through : Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.Garg, J. (Oral)
1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant -
Mohan to impugn a judgment dated 14.01.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions
Judge (Special Fast Track Court), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in Sessions
Case No.17/13 arising out of FIR No. 234 dated 18.11.2011 PS Chhawla
by which he was convicted under Section 376 IPC read with Section 511
IPC. By an order dated 17.01.2013, he was awarded RI for four years with
fine `10,000/-.
2. Allegations against the appellant as reflected in the charge-
sheet were that on 16.11.2011 at about 04.30 p.m. he attempted to commit
rape upon the prosecutrix 'X' (assumed name), aged around four years.
The prosecution examined fifteen witnesses to substantiate its case. In 313
Cr.P.C. statement, the appellant pleaded false implication. The trial
resulted in his conviction as aforesaid.
3. The appellant preferred the instant appeal before this Court
on 15.05.2013. Order dated 29.09.2015 records that learned counsel for
the appellant informed the Court that to his information the appellant had
already served out the sentence awarded to him by the Trial Court. Vide
order dated 29.09.2015, fresh Nominal Roll of the appellant was called
along with issuance of production warrants for his appearance.
4. Report bearing No.F.1/SCJ-1/AS(CT)/2015/4154 dated
23.10.2015 has been received from the Superintendent, Central Jail No.1,
Tihar, New Delhi, to the effect that the appellant has already been released
on 04.05.2015 after completion of sentence. The fine has already been
deposited by him in jail.
5. Since the appellant has served out the sentence awarded to
him and has deposited the fine, it appears that for that reason, he has not
contacted the counsel or the Court to get the appeal decided on merits.
The appeal has thus become infructuous and is disposed of as such. It is,
however, made clear that if the appellant appears within a reasonable time
for disposal of appeal on merits, his request will be considered.
6. Trial Court record be sent back immediately with the copy of
the order. A copy of the order be sent to the Superintendent Jail for
information.
(S.P.GARG) JUDGE OCTOBER 28, 2015 / tr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!