Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 7699 Del
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2015
$~46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 3231/1989
M/S MGF (I) LTD. ..... Plaintiff
Through : None.
versus
M/S PS JAIN CO. LTD. ..... Defendant
Through : None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 07.10.2015
1. The present suit has been placed before the Court by the
Registry.
2. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that the plaintiff had
instituted the present suit in the year 1989, under Section 20 of the
Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 paying inter alia that the dispute between
the parties may be referred to a Sole Arbitrator named in the Hire
Purchase Agreement dated 10.9.1986. Evidence was concluded in the
suit on 25.5.1999, whereafter arguments were to be addressed by the
parties. However, the records reveal that at the request of counsels
for the parties, the case was adjourned on several dates. Finally, on
24.3.2003, counsel for the defendants had stated that the suit against
the defendant No.2 had abated. In view of the said submission,
counsel for the plaintiff had sought time to obtain instructions from her
client as to whether it proposed to give up defendant No.2 from the
array of respondents. Thereafter, the case has not been listed before
the Court. Nor have any of the parties approached the Court for
seeking revival of the suit.
3. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the
present suit, which has remained pending for the last twelve years.
Accordingly, the same is disposed of, with liberty granted to the
parties to seek revival of the proceedings, if necessary. Such an
application when filed, shall be considered and decided in accordance
with law.
HIMA KOHLI, J OCTOBER 07, 2015 sk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!