Sunday, 14, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Om Prakash Dhakolia vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 4508 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 4508 Del
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2015

Delhi High Court
Om Prakash Dhakolia vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 29 June, 2015
Author: Sunil Gaur
I-19
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                  Date of Decision: 29th June, 2015

+     CRL.M.C. 2555/2015 & Crl.M.A.Nos.9089-90/2015
      OM PRAKASH DHAKOLIA                    ..... Petitioner
                  Through: Mr. Satish Pandey, Advocate

                         versus

      CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ( CBI)
                                               ..... Respondent
                  Through: Ms.Sonia Mathur, Special Public
                            Prosecutor for CBI with Mr. Sushil
                            Dubey, Advocate

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

                         JUDGMENT

% (ORAL)

Petitioner is facing trial in CC No.33/12, CBI Vs. Om Prakash Dhakolia for the offences under Sections120B/420/468/471 of the IPC read with Section 13 (i) (d) & 13 (2) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1981 and vide impugned order of 11th February, 2015, his application under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. for recalling of Investigating Officer (PW-21) has been declined by the trial court while noting that Investigating Officer (PW-21) is a formal witness.

Notice.

On behalf of respondent-CBI, it is submitted that the Investigating Officer (PW-21) was discharged in pre-lunch session when counsel for

Crl.M.C.No.2555/2015 Page 1 petitioner was not available.

Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned order of 11 th February, 2015, I find that Investigating Officer (PW-21) cannot be said to be a formal witness and for the lapse on the part of petitioner's counsel, petitioner ought to be put to terms.

In view of the aforesaid, this petition is allowed and impugned order of 11th February, 2015 dismissing petitioner's application under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. is hereby quashed subject to cost of `25,000/- to be deposited with the Prime Minister's Relief Fund within a week and upon placing on record its original receipt before the trial court, one effective opportunity be given to petitioner to cross-examine Investigating Officer (PW-21).

This petition and applications are disposed of in aforesaid terms. Trial court be apprised of this order forthwith.




                                                          (SUNIL GAUR)
                                                            JUDGE
JUNE 29, 2015
r




Crl.M.C.No.2555/2015                                                  Page 2
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter