Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh Chand Sharma vs Managing Committee Of Rukmani ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 483 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 483 Del
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2015

Delhi High Court
Dinesh Chand Sharma vs Managing Committee Of Rukmani ... on 19 January, 2015
Author: Valmiki J. Mehta
*            IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                          W.P.(C) No. 5633/2013
%                                                   19th January , 2015

DINESH CHAND SHARMA                                       ......Petitioner
                 Through:                Mr. Ashok Aggarwal and Ms. Kusum
                                         Sharma, Advocates.


                           VERSUS

MANAGING COMMITTEE OF RUKMANI DEVI JAIPURIA PUBLIC
SCHOOL & ORS.                           ...... Respondents
               Through: Dr. M.Y.Khan, Adv. for R-1/school.

                                         Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. for Ms.
                                         Ruchi Sindhwani and Ms.Meena
                                         Goswami, Advs. for R-3.



CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?


VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.           Petitioner is employed as an Physical Education Teacher

(P.E.T)/Physical Training Instructor (P.T.I) with the respondent no.1-school,

Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School. Petitioner by means of this writ

petition seeks the following reliefs:-


                           PRAYER
WPC 5633/2013                                                             Page 1 of 5
       In the premise aforesaid, the petitioner most humbly prays that this
      Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
      a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or directions directing the
         respondents no.1 & 2 to grant the Petitioner full benefits of the
         ACP scheme along with all the consequential benefits at par with
         his counterparts employed in the schools of the respondent no.3.
      b. issue directions to Respondent No.3 to take appropriate action
         against the Respondent school under Delhi School Education Act
         upon failure by the Respondents No. 1 & 2 to grant the petitioner
         the senior scale of Rs.5,500-175-9000/- as first up-gradation under
         the ACP Scheme w.e.f. 16.07.2002 i.e. the date of completing the
         12 years of service and full benefits of the ACP scheme along with
         all the consequential benefits.
      c. pass any such order or directions as this Hon'ble court may in the
         facts and circumstances of the present case deem fit and proper in
         favour of the petitioner and against the respondents:
         and
      d. allow the present writ petition of the petitioner with costs;"


2.          Essentially, the petitioner seeks the higher pay-scale under the

Assured Career Progression (ACP) scheme dated 25.8.2003 of granting a

financial upgradation after 12 years of service in terms of the scheme dated

25.8.2003 enforced by the Directorate of Education with respect to schools.


3.          I find that the present petition is bereft of the necessary and the

requisite pleadings which are required to be made for the petitioner, who is

an Physical Education Teacher (P.E.T)/Physical Training Instructor (P.T.I),


WPC 5633/2013                                                               Page 2 of 5
 for being entitled to claim the financial upgradation in terms of the ACP

scheme.


4.               The ACP scheme as relied upon by the petitioner is Annexure

P-2, and is dated 25.8.2003, and which scheme itself as per its various

paragraphs requires besides completion of service of 12 years screening by

Departmental Screening Committee (DSC) and which DSC vide paras 8 and

11 requires that certain norms of eligibility criteria have to be complied with

by aspirants before the benefits of ACP scheme are granted. The said paras

8, 11 and 11.1 read as under:-


      "8.        The concerned DDEs/branch In-charge will collect the requisite
                 information in r/o all categories of eligible teachers in
                 prescribed performa along with ACRs of 5 years preceding the
                 due date of award of ACP, work and conduct report, integrity
                 certificate, vigilance clearance and will submit the same to
                 concerned Establishment Branch for submitting before the
                 Screening Committee for taking further necessary action.
      ........
      11.        The following points are to be kept in mind while submitting
                 the case of teachers before the Screening Committee:-
      11.1 Fulfillment of normal promotion norms (including educational
           qualifications as per Recruitment Rules) for grant of financial
           up-gradation, performance of such duties as are entrusted to the
           employees together with retention of old designations, financial
           up-gradation as personal to the incumbent for the stated
           purposes and restriction of the ACO scheme for financial and
           certain other benefits (HBA, allotment of govt, accomodation,
           advance etc) only without conferring any privileges related to
WPC 5633/2013                                                               Page 3 of 5
              higher status (e.g. invitation to ceremonial functions,
             deputations to higher posts etc) shall be ensured for grant of
             benefits under ACP scheme." (underlining added)
5.           In the present petition I do not find any averment whatsoever,

much less the necessary averments with respect to how the petitioner

complies with the eligibility criteria of the promotion norms as stated in para

11.1 and related aspects of seeking ACP Scheme and which are also

specified in para 8 of the circular/scheme dated 25.8.2003.


6.           Therefore it is not understood by the Court that how in the

absence of relevant pleading the petitioner will be entitled to benefits of the

ACP scheme and which ACP entitlement is not an automatic entitlement

because in terms of the scheme the claims/entitlement to ACP Scheme has to

be examined by a Screening Committee and which has to examine the

fulfillment of eligibility criteria. Thus no reliefs can be granted as the

petitioner who has failed to show as to how the petitioner complied with the

eligibility criteria for ACP Scheme with respect to the ACRs, eligibility

criteria of promotion rules to the higher post etc etc.


7.           After conclusion of the arguments, I put it to counsels for the

petitioner that in the opinion of this Court it is better if the petitioner

withdraws this petition and files a detailed writ petition giving the necessary

WPC 5633/2013                                                               Page 4 of 5
 averments constituting the required cause of action that the petitioner

satisfies the eligibility criteria for being entitled to the benefits under the

ACP scheme by pleading requisite details, but, counsels for the petitioner

insist that the judgment be passed on the basis of the present writ petition

and the record.


8.           In view of the above, since the petitioner has failed to satisfy

the Court as to how the petitioner satisfies the eligibility criteria for grant of

benefit of the ACP scheme, 2003, hence there is no merit in the petition and

the same is therefore dismissed. No costs.




JANUARY 19, 2015                               VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

ib

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter