Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1003 Del
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2015
$~35.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 279/2015 and I.A. 2242-2243/2015
M/S B.R ARORA & ASSOCIATES (P) LTD ..... Plaintiff
Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Advocate with
Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocate
versus
INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPEMENT CORPN LTD ..... Defendant
Through: NONE
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 03.02.2015
1. Counsel for the plaintiff states that she may be permitted to
withdraw the present suit on the ground that the defendant/ITDC does
not propose to encash the subject bank guarantee as of now. She
however, reserves the right of the plaintiff to institute a fresh suit in
case of a fresh cause of action arising in favour of her client.
2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The suit is dismissed as
withdrawn alongwith the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J FEBRUARY 03, 2015 rkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!