Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1553 Del
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on: 5th March, 2012
+ MAC.APP. 381/2009
NEW INDIA ASS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocate
versus
PREM WATI &ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
JUDGMENT
G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1. This appeal is for reduction of compensation of `20,10,804/- awarded for the death of the Dev Raj in a motor accident which occurred on 13.04.2006.
2. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that future income of `c 2,50,000/- was assumed by the Claims Tribunal without any basis.
3. I have perused the record.
4. Although the Claims Tribunal relied on Sarla Dixit & Anr. v. Balwant Yadav AIR 1996 SC 1274 but without any basis assumed the
average future income of the deceased as `2,50,000/-. Since there was gradual increase in the deceased's income, the Respondents (the Claimants) were entitled to 50% increase towards future prospects on the basis of Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121. Deducting 1/4th towards personal living expenses (considering number of dependants as 6) and adopting a multiplier of 16, the loss of dependency would come to `11,07,000/- (`61500+50%x3/4x16).
5. The Tribunal erred in jointly granting a sum of `25,000/- towards Funeral Expenses and loss of Love and Affection. I would make provision for the same separately and in addition grant a sum of `10,000/- each towards Loss to Estate and Loss of Consortium. The
compensation is awarded as under:-
Loss of Dependency : `11,07,000/-
Loss of Love and Affection : `25,000/-
Funeral Expenses : `10,000/-
Loss to Estate : `10,000/-
Loss of Consortium : `10,000/-
___________
Total `11,62,000/-
6. In terms of order dated 10.08.2009 of this Court an amount of `12 lacs (inclusive of interest) was to be deposited as a condition of
grant of stay of the execution. The Appellant was liable to deposit `11,62,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of
filing of the petition till the date of deposit. The shortfall shall be made by the Appellant/Insurance Company within 30 days.
7. By an order dated 14.10.2009 a sum of `2 lac in all was ordered to be released. It appears that the same has not been released as the Respondents did not come forward. 10% of the awarded amount along with proportionate interest shall be payable to Respondent No.3 and 5% each to Respondents No. 2,4,5 and 6. Rest shall go to the Respondent No.1. The amount payable to Respondents Nos. 4,5 and 6 shall be held in Fixed Deposit till they attain the age of 21 years. The amount payable to Respondents No. 2 and 3 shall be released forthwith. 25% of the amount payable to Respondent No.1 shall be released on deposit. Rest of the amount shall be held in Fixed Deposit for a period of 2 years, 4 years, 6 years and 8 years in equal proportion in UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch. The Respondent No.1 and 4 to 6 shall be entitled to payment of monthly interest.
8. The statutory amount of `25,000/- shall be released in favour of the Appellant.
9. The appeal is allowed of in above terms.
(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE MARCH 05, 2012 mr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!