Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1472 Del
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 1st March, 2012
+ W.P.(C) NO.2743/1999
JAI SINGH GUSAIN ... Petitioner
versus
UOI & ORS. ... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : None.
For Respondent : Mr. M.P. Singh, Advocate with
Mr. Bhopender Sharma, BSF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
ANIL KUMAR, J.(Oral)
1. No one was present on behalf of the petitioner and, therefore, the
matter was passed over.
2. Even after pass over, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Perusal of the record reveals that no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner
even on 2nd February, 2012. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option
but to dismiss the writ petition in default of appearance of the petitioner or his
counsel.
3. The writ petition is dismissed in default.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. March 01, 2012 dr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!