Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 4016 Del
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 09.07.2012
+ W.P.(C) No.3107/2012
Bhani Singh ... Petitioner
versus
Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr.K.K.Sharma.
For the Respondents : Mr.Himanshu Bajaj.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that
petitioner is completing some formalities in anticipation of joining soon
and he may join either today or tomorrow. The learned counsel for the
petitioner in the circumstances on instructions from the petitioner
states that the petitioner does not press the writ petition any further as
the relief sought by him has almost been granted to him. The learned
counsel for the petitioner on instructions also states that his client does
not press for any cost against the respondents.
Pursuant to order dated 4th July, 2012 an affidavit dated 6th July,
2012 of Mr.Nityananda Ray, Under Secretary (NR), Staff Selection
Commission has been filed giving the explanation as to how the delay
happened in preparing the order and forwarding it to the Border
Security Force. The explanation given by the deponent is accepted and
any further proceedings in this regard are discharged. The delay which
had occurred in forwarding the letter pursuant to order dated 31st May,
2012 is condoned. CM No.8315/2012 is disposed of. The writ petition
is also disposed of in terms hereof. Parties are left to bear their own
cost.
Dasti.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
JULY 09, 2012 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!