Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 361 Del
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) No.8306/2011
% Date of Decision: 18.01.2012
Rajesh Kumar .... Petitioner
Through Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate.
Versus
Union of India & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Mr.Jatan Singh, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R.MIDHA
ANIL KUMAR, J.
* The learned counsel for the respondents contends that the Courts
at Delhi does not have jurisdiction. According to Clause 15 of the
advertisement, the jurisdiction is of the Punjab & Haryana High Court
at Chandigarh as the regional office where the application was
submitted by the petitioner and other steps were taken was at the
regional office, Chandigarh.
After some arguments, in the circumstances, learned counsel for
the petitioner on instructions seeks to withdraw the writ petition with
liberty to file the appropriate writ petition in the High Court of Punjab &
Haryana at Chandigarh. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as
prayed for. All the pending applications are disposed off.
Considering the facts and circumstances the interim order dated
30th November, 2011 directing the respondents to reserve one post of
Constable (GD) CISF/CRPF/BSF/SSB will continue for two weeks more.
Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
J.R.MIDHA, J.
January 18, 2012 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!