Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satish Kumar vs Abdul Hamid & Ors
2012 Latest Caselaw 2420 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 2420 Del
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2012

Delhi High Court
Satish Kumar vs Abdul Hamid & Ors on 13 April, 2012
Author: G.P. Mittal
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                               Decided on: 13th April, 2012

+       MAC.APP. 172/2012

        SATISH KUMAR                                  ..... Appellant
                                 Through:   Mr.Manish Maini, Advocate

                        versus

        ABDUL HAMID & ORS                          ..... Respondents
                    Through:                Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for
                                            R-3.
        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL

                                 JUDGMENT

G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Issue notice.

2. Mr. Pankaj Seth accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.3.

There is no breach of the policy condition; therefore, service of other Respondents is dispensed with.

3. By impugned judgment a compensation of ` 1,33,195/- was awarded in favour of the Appellant for having suffered injuries in a motor accident on 11.09.2006.

4. The Petition was preferred u/s 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Strangely the Claims Tribunal held that though the involvement of the vehicle was proved and since it was a case of no fault

liability 'it was not essential to go into the question of negligence'. It is well settled that in a Claim Petition u/s 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act the tortfeasor would be liable only if the accident took place because of his negligence or default. The impugned order, therefore, cannot be sustained; the same is accordingly set aside.

5. The case is remanded back to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for deciding the case in accordance with law. The Claims Tribunal shall be at liberty to reappraise the evidence afresh even on the quantum of compensation.

6. The Appeal is allowed in above terms. Parties are directed to appear before the Claims Tribunal on 14.05.2012. If the compensation has been withdrawn by the Appellant, it shall be deposited with the Claims Tribunal for refund to the Respondent/Insurance Company

(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE APRIL 13, 2012 mr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter