Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 729 Del
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CM No.1641/2010 & W.P.(C) No.1373/2005
% Date of Decision: 07.02.2011
Director of Education .... Petitioner
Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate.
Versus
Mrs.Sara Verma & Anr. .... Respondents
Through Mr.Puneet Taneja, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
This is an application by the petitioner/applicant to take on
record the office memorandum dated 10th July, 1977 and 24th October,
1978. The applicant has contended that the abovenoted office
memorandums are relevant, however, no grounds for not producing
them earlier before this Court or before the Tribunal have been
disclosed in the application.
In any case the validity of the order of the Tribunal cannot be
adjudicated on the basis of these office memorandums which were not
before the Tribunal and which had not been considered while passing
the order dated 14th July, 2004 and 2nd September, 2004 in O.A
No.2240/2002.
In the circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner on
instructions seeks to withdraw the petition and the application with
liberty to seek review of the order dated 14th July, 2004 and 2nd
September, 2004 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, principal
bench, New Delhi on the basis of abovenoted office memorandums.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with the liberty as prayed for. No order about costs.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
VEENA BIRBAL, J.
FEBRUARY 07, 2011 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!