Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 2034 Del
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
COMPANY JURISDICTION
CO.APPLN. (C) NO. 59 OF 2008
Reserved on : 12-04-2010
Date of pronouncement: 19-04-2010
M/s Jagatjit Brown Forman (India) Ltd. (in Liqn)
through the Official Liquidator
...........Applicant
Through Ms. Purnima Sethi, Advocate,
Advocate
Versus
Kerala State Beverages Corpn. .........Respondent
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
judgment? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This is an application by the Official Liquidator attached to
this Court under S.446 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the recovery of
an amount of Rs.14,081/- with interest @ 18% per annum, from the
respondent M/s Kerala State Beverages Corporation.
2. Pursuant to a petition filed on 14th December, 1999, M/s
Jagatjit Brown Forman (India) Pvt. Ltd. was directed to be
provisionally wound up on 19th December, 2003 and final winding up
orders were passed by this Court on 12th January, 2005. The Official
Liquidator attached to this Court was appointed as its liquidator.
3. The company in liquidation, i.e M/s Jagatjit Brown Forman
(India) Pvt. Ltd., was in the business of manufacture, sale and export
of liquor and alcoholic beverages and other consumer products.
4. On examination of the statement of affairs filed by the Ex-
Directors under S.454 of the Companies Act, 1956 along with a list of
debtors, the Official Liquidator discovered that an amount of
Rs. 14,081/- is due to the company in liquidation from the
respondent. The Official Liquidator has, therefore, moved this
application praying for an order of recovery of the said amount, along
with interest @18% per annum till its realization in favour of the
applicant, against the respondent.
5. There has been no appearance on behalf of the respondent
so far. The affidavit of service of the respondent has since been filed.
Consequently, the respondent was directed to be proceeded ex-parte,
and the matter was adjourned to 10th March, 2010. On 12th April,
2010, the applicant's evidence was completed and arguments were
heard.
6. An affidavit of Shri Sudhir Kapoor, Assistant Official
Liquidator, was filed on 6th April, 2010 by way of evidence in support
of the application. Ex.PW1/1 is a computerized copy of the ledger
account maintained by the company in liquidation, pertaining to the
respondent. In that ledger, a debit balance of Rs. 14,081/- is reflected.
Ex.PW1/2 is a copy of the demand notice dated 19th July, 2005 sent by
the Official Liquidator to the respondent under S.446 of the Companies
Act, 1956, seeking recovery of Rs. 14,081/-. Ex.PW1/3 is a copy of the
speed post tracking document, evidencing that the aforesaid notice
was duly served. The respondent has not bothered to respond to the
notice of demand.
7. It is stated by counsel for the OL that this claim was due to
the company in liquidation on 31st March, 2000 and is within limitation.
8. There is no defence to the claim. The amount claimed
stands proved.
9. Consequently, the respondent is directed to pay an amount
of Rs. 14,081/- to the applicant, along with interest @ 6% per annum
from the date of the application till the date of realization of the
amount in favour of the applicant.
10. The application is disposed of.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
APRIL 19, 2010
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!