Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 4264 Del
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2009
26
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ FAO.No.79/2000
Date of Decision: 22nd October, 2009
%
SHRI RAM ..... Appellant
Through : Ms. Aruna Mehta, Adv.
versus
BANWARI LAL & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. M.K. Tiwari, Adv. for
Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES
3. Whether the judgment should be YES
reported in the Digest?
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned
Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.1,47,400/- has been
awarded to the appellant.
2. The accident dated 10th September 1994 resulted in
amputation of left leg of the appellant below knee. The
disability of the appellant was assessed to be 70% as per
disability certificate. The appellant was aged 45 years
working as Chowkidar earning Rs.2,200/- per month. The
learned Tribunal took the disability of the appellant to be
35% and the compensation towards loss of income was
computed to be Rs.92,400/- (Rs.770 x 12 x 10). The learned
Tribunal awarded Rs.5,000/- towards expenses on account of
special diet, Rs.15,000/- towards conveyance charges,
Rs.10,000/- towards pain and agony, Rs.5,000/- towards
attendant charges, Rs.15,000/- towards expenses on account
of loss of income and Rs.5,000/- towards purchase of
medicines. The total compensation awarded is Rs.1,47,400/-.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
learned Tribunal has not taken the future prospects into
consideration. The learned counsel further submits that the
multiplier be enhanced from 10 to 14 considering the age of
the appellant. The learned counsel further submits that the
disability of the injured be taken to be 100% considering that
the appellant is not in a position to work. The learned counsel
further seeks enhancement towards compensation for pain
and agony. The learned counsel also submits that no
compensation has been awarded towards loss of amenities of
life.
4. In this facts and circumstances of this case, the income
of the deceased is taken to be Rs.2200/-, 30% is added
towards the future prospects and multiplier of 14 is applied
following the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 (6)
Scale 129 and the disability of the injuried is taken to be
70%. The loss of income is computed to be Rs.3,36,336/-
[(Rs.2,200 + 30%) x 12 x 14 x 70%].
5. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,000/- towards
pain and agony which is enhanced to Rs.25,000/-. The
learned Tribunal has not awarded any compensation towards
loss of amenities of life. Rs 25,000/- is awarded towards loss
of amenities of life. The claimant are entitled to total
compensation of Rs.4,31,336/- (Rs.3,36,336 + Rs.5,000 +
Rs.5,000 + Rs.15,000 + Rs.25,000 + Rs.25,000 + Rs.5,000 +
Rs.15,000).
6. The appeal is allowed and award amount is enhanced
from Rs.1,37,400/- to Rs.4,31,336/-. The learned Tribunal has
awarded interest @ 12% per annum which is not disturbed
on the original award amount. However, on the enhanced
award amount, the rate of interest shall be @ 7.5% per
annum from the filing of the petition till realization.
7. The enhanced award amount be deposited by
respondent No.3 with State Bank of India by means of a
cheque drawn in the name of State Bank of India A/c Shri
Ram.
8. Upon the award amount being deposited, State Bank of
India is directed to release a sum of Rs.35,000/- to each of
claimants/appellants No.1 to 3.
9. The claimants shall have equal share in the remaining
award amount and their share be kept in fixed deposit in
their respective names for a period of five years on which
month interest be paid to them.
10. The interest on the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be
paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the respective
Savings Account of the claimants.
11. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be
permitted to the claimants after due verification and the
Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to the claimants to
facilitate identity.
12. No cheque book be issued to the claimants without the
permission of this Court.
13. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the
said fixed deposit without the permission of this Court.
14. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in
this Court.
15. On the request of the claimants, the Bank shall transfer
the Savings Bank Accounts to any other branch of State Bank
of India according to the convenience of the claimants.
16. The claimants shall furnish all the relevant documents
for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed Deposit
Account to Mr. H.S. Rawat, Relationship Manager, Tis Hazari
Branch, Tis Hazari (Mb: 09717044322).
17. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the
parties under the signatures of the Court Master.
18. Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. H.S. Rawat,
Relationship Manager, Tis Hazari Branch, Tis Hazari
(Mb: 09717044322) under the signature of Court Master.
19. List for reporting compliance on 2nd December 2009.
J.R. MIDHA, J
OCTOBER 22, 2009 sp
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!