Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 4443 Del
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2009
31
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAC.APP.No.268/2009
% Date of decision: 3rd November, 2009
SHIV LAL ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Multan Singh, Adv.
versus
CHARAN SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through : Ms. Hetu Arora, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES
3. Whether the judgment should be YES
reported in the Digest?
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned
Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.31,678/- has been awarded
to him. The appellant seeks enhancement of the award amount.
2. The accident dated 20th June, 1997 resulted in grievous
injuries to the appellant. The appellant suffered fracture on his
right leg for which he was treated at AIIMS. The appellant was
initially plastered. The appellant is native of Village Baporolli,
District Mahendergarh, Haryana and he visited the hospital for
treatment from Mahendergarh. The appellant was operated upon
and a metal rod was inserted in his right shin which is continuing
till date. The appellant remained absent from his duty for about
six months and claimed medical expenses of Rs.15,000/-,
conveyance of Rs.9,638/- and loss of Rs.37,350/- due to his leave.
3. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,000/- towards pain
and suffering, Rs.2,000/- towards special diet, Rs.1,000/- towards
conveyance and Rs.18,678/- towards loss of income. The total
compensation awarded is Rs.31,678/-.
4. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks enhancement
of compensation under all the above mentioned heads.
5. With respect to the compensation for loss of income, the
learned Tribunal has awarded 50% of the salary of six months on
the ground that the appellant has not suffered loss of income as
he was a Government servant. However, considering that he
could have utilized the leave for some other benevolent purpose,
the learned Tribunal awarded 50% of the total salary to the
appellant. The findings of the learned Tribunal in this regard are
correct and are upheld.
6. With respect to the compensation for pain and suffering,
special diet and conveyance, the compensation awarded by the
learned Tribunal is on a lower side. Considering that the
appellant suffered fracture of his right leg for which he was
operated upon and a rod was inserted and he also remained
under treatment for about six months, the compensation for pain
and suffering is enhanced from Rs.10,000/- to Rs.15,000/-.
7. The learned Tribunal has not awarded any compensation for
loss of amenities of life. Rs.10,000/- is awarded towards loss of
amenities of life. The compensation of Rs.2,000/- towards special
diet is not disturbed. However, with respect to the compensation
towards conveyance, the appellant has proved Ex.CW1/B which
are receipts issued by the driver of the vehicle who used to carry
the appellant from Mahendergarh to Delhi for treatment. It is
stated in the said receipts that distance between Mahendergarh
and Delhi is 320 kms. and the driver has charged that
conveyance at the rate of Rs.5.30 per km. The receipts totaling
Rs.9,368/- have been proved by the appellant which have not
been considered by the learned Tribunal. The compensation
towards conveyance is, therefore, enhanced from Rs.1,000/- to
Rs.9,368/-.
8. The appellant is entitled to total compensation of
Rs.55,316/- (Rs.15,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.2,000 + Rs.9,638 +
Rs.18,678).
9. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is enhanced
from Rs.31,678/- to Rs.55,316/-. The learned Tribunal has
awarded interest @ 9% per annum which is not disturbed on the
original award amount of Rs.31,678/-. However, on the enhanced
award amount, the rate of interest shall be 7.5% per annum from
the date of filing of the petition till realization.
10. Respondent No.3 is directed to deposit the enhanced award
amount along with interest with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court
Branch A/c Shiv Lal within 30 days.
11. Upon such deposit being made, the UCO Bank is directed to
release 50% of the award amount to the appellant by transferring
the same to the Saving Bank Account of the appellant.
12. The remaining amount be kept in fixed deposit for a period
of two years with cumulative interest.
13. After the payment of the enhanced award amount along
with interest, respondent No.3 shall be entitled to recover the
same from respondents No.1 and 2 in terms of the original award.
14. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel for the
parties under signature of Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J
NOVEMBER 03, 2009 aj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!