Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 965 Del
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Reserve: March 20, 2009
Date of Order: March 24, 2009
+ OMP 127/2009
% 24.03.2009
Upaid Systems Limited ...Petitioner
Through: Mr. Neel Mason, Advocate
Versus
Satyam Computer Services & Anr. ...Respondents
Through:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
JUDGMENT
1. In view of the judgment of this Court in M/s. Wooster Products Inc. v.
M/s. Magna Tek Inc. and others AIR 1989 Delhi 6, I consider that this petition
is very much maintainable.
2. Issue notice of the petition to the respondents as well as to NASSOCOM
located at International Youth Centre, Teen Murti Marg, Chankyapuri, New
Delhi-110021, returnable for 20th April 2009. Steps for service be taken within
three days.
3. Matter be listed before the Regular Bench on 20th April 2009, under the
orders of the Judge Incharge (Original Side).
March 24, 2009 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA J. rd OMP 127/2009 Upaid Systems Ltd. vs.Satyam Computers Page 1 Of 1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!