Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 964 Del
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) NO. 6927/2009
% Date of Decision : 24.03.2009
OM PRAKASH MISRA .... Petitioner
Through : Petitioner in person.
Versus
CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S .... Respondent
HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD.
Through : Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be
allowed to see the judgment? NO
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in
the Digest? NO
V. K. SHALI, J.(Oral)
*
1. It is 4.05 PM when the order is about to be dictated in the open
Court in the presence of the petitioner as well Mr. Ratan K. Singh
learned counsel for the respondent/management, the petitioner has
stated that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition as
it involves disputed question of facts and he may be permitted to file a
suit in the appropriate Court for the adjudication of his grievance
challenging the order of acceptance of resignation on the ground that at
WP(C) No.6927/2009 Page 1 of 2
the time when the resignation was given by him, he was not in a sound
state of mind.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent/management though
asked as to whether he would have any objection, in case, the petitioner
is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a suit, he
refrained from making any submissions.
3. In view of the statement made by the petitioner, he is permitted to
withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a suit in appropriate
forum. However, this does not preclude the respondent/management
to raise any objection including with regard to the question of
limitation.
4. With these observations, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
MARCH 24, 2009 V.K. SHALI, J.
KP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!