Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 1056 Del
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CCP No.48/2009 in CS(OS) No.180/1997
% Date of Decision: 30.03.2009
The Vaish Co-Operative Adarsh Bank Ltd .... Petitioner
Through Ms.Gagan Gupta, Advocate.
Versus
Sh.V.K.Soin .... Respondent
Through Ms.Rekha Palli, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
The learned counsel for the respondent states that the cheque
could not be encashed on account of some doubt about the signatures
of the judgment debtor raised by the bank without intimation to the
judgment debtor.
The learned counsel has also produced a copy of the letter from
the bank dated 28th March, 2009 stipulating that M/s.Pushpa Builder
is maintaining the current account with the branch. The said cheque
No.6640 for Rs.7 lakhs issued in favour of Vaish Cooperative Adarsh
Bank Ltd was returned earlier on account of signatures not tallied. The
bankers have now stated that the same will be cleared in case it is
presented. The letter is taken on record. The petitioner is permitted to
encash the cheque.
Considering the facts and circumstances, there is no willful or
deliberate violation of any of the orders passed by this Court. The
contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed and the contempt notice
issued to the respondent/contemnor is withdrawn.
The petition is disposed of.
MARCH 30, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. "K"
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!